MHB What are the axioms underlying the definition of sine?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the axioms underlying the definition of the sine function. It highlights that sine can be defined through Euclidean geometry axioms and the field of real numbers, as well as through a power series that requires fewer axioms. The conversation also touches on the distinction between axioms, definitions, and propositions in mathematics. Additionally, a differential equations approach is proposed, linking sine to solutions of specific equations. Overall, the thread emphasizes the foundational concepts necessary for understanding the sine function's definition.
roni1
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
My class is difficult to teach, but I have a question that I think that I share the forum and if you give nice ideas it can be helpful.
This is my last question of axioms and so on because I don't want to be as a mathematic cranck.
So, this is my last question that deal with it.
What I need to answer to the question: "What are the axioms of sinus definition?"
Any ideas?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
roni said:
My class is difficult to teach, but I have a question that I think that I share the forum and if you give nice ideas it can be helpful.
This is my last question of axioms and so on because I don't want to be as a mathematic cranck.
So, this is my last question that deal with it.
What I need to answer to the question: "What are the axioms of sinus definition?"
Any ideas?

Hey roni,

Classicaly, the sine is defined through the axioms (also known as postulates) of Euclidean Geometry, which is what is needed to define a right-angled triangle. And we also need the axioms of the Field of the real numbers, since the sine is defined as the quotient of 2 real numbers.

However, the sine has a number of equivalent definitions.
One of those is:
$$\sin x = x - \frac{x^3}{3!} + \frac{x^5}{5!} - \frac{x^7}{7!} + \cdots $$
With this definition it suffices to just have the axioms of a Field.
And the same definition applies both to the field of the real numbers and to the field of the complex numbers.
So this definition is more general than the geometric definition and requires fewer axioms.

For the record, there are 3 types of statements in mathematics:
  1. Axioms or Postulates.
  2. Definitions.
  3. Propositions, Theorems, Lemmas, Corollaries (all require a Proof).
The axioms or postulates are the assumptions we make that define the framework of what follows.
Definitions define terms or symbols that we will then use afterwards.
Propositions, theorems, lemmas, and corollaries are statements that follow from the axioms and definitions. They are accompanied by a Proof to prove that they are actually true. Each of these terms is used interchangeably and formally they all mean the same thing. It's a matter of preference which one is used.
 
roni said:
My class is difficult to teach, but I have a question that I think that I share the forum and if you give nice ideas it can be helpful.

Still I am curious about what class you are teaching. Is it introductory analysis?

roni said:
This is my last question of axioms and so on because I don't want to be as a mathematic cranck.

Asking about axioms does not make you a crank.

roni said:
So, this is my last question that deal with it.
What I need to answer to the question: "What are the axioms of sinus definition?"
Any ideas?

It is my impression that some of the "axioms" you are asking about are really definitions of minimal structures (such as the algebraic structure "field") underlying the concept of interest (such as "integral" or "sine".)

In addition to the answers by ILS in post #2, I would like to offer my favorite one. Namely, given the system of differential equations
\[
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
\dot{u} &= v,\\
\dot{v} &= -u,\\
\end{aligned}
\right.
\]
with initial values $u(0) = 0, v(0) = 1$, we denote the global solution $(u, v) : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}^2$ and then we define $\sin := u$ and $\cos := v$.

If you apply Picard iteration to solve the above differential equation, then for $u$ you obtain precisely the power series from post #2, while for $v$ you obtain the familiar power series for $\cos$.

(Credits to Joost Hulshof (VU, Amsterdam) for showing this once in his Analysis I course.)
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
102
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top