What are the Confusing Aspects of Jackson Eq. 5.33 (3rd Ed.)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shehry1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jackson
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the interpretation of Jackson's Equation 5.33 from the 3rd Edition of "Classical Electrodynamics." Key points include the convenience of using the delta function with cosine rather than sine for simplification, the necessity of the radius 'a' in the current density equation, and the clarification that the current density J is defined as J = I/Area, not J = I/Area^2. The participants emphasize the importance of these formulations for accurate calculations in electromagnetism.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of delta functions in mathematical physics
  • Familiarity with current density and its relation to electric current
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates and their application in physics
  • Basic principles of electromagnetism as outlined in "Classical Electrodynamics"
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of delta functions in electromagnetism
  • Review the derivation of current density in various geometries
  • Explore the implications of using spherical coordinates in physics problems
  • Investigate the significance of the radius in current density calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and researchers focusing on electromagnetism, particularly those studying Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" and its applications in theoretical physics.

shehry1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I can't seem to figure out how he writes down this equation. Specifically:
a. Isn't Theta' = 90 degrees. Then why doesn't he write it out explicitly.
b. Whats the use of adding the Sin(Theta') if he is going to use a delta function using the Cos
c. What is the radius 'a' doing there. If the wire has no thickness, shouldn't the magnitude of J equal I.
d. Shouldn't J=I/Area^2 in terms of units.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
shehry1 said:

Homework Statement


I can't seem to figure out how he writes down this equation. Specifically:
a. Isn't Theta' = 90 degrees. Then why doesn't he write it out explicitly.

Because it's more convenient to write the measure as

\delta(\cos \theta') d(\cos \theta')

rather than

\sin \theta' \delta(\theta') d\theta'

It saves a lot of time, trust me.

b. Whats the use of adding the Sin(Theta') if he is going to use a delta function using the Cos

The current loop is in the x-y plane, where

\sin \theta' = 1

which is the same as

\cos \theta' = 0

I suppose he could have technically left out the sin(theta) and just put in 1 (just as he puts in 1/a instead of 1/r). However, perhaps he put it in so that the formula would be easier to generalize.

c. What is the radius 'a' doing there. If the wire has no thickness, shouldn't the magnitude of J equal I.

No. The integral of J over its cross-sectional area should equal I. That is:

I = \iint_R r \; dr \; d(\cos \theta) \; I \delta(\cos \theta) \frac{\delta(r-a)}{a}

where R is some vertical region that cuts across part of the wire. So you see, the 1/a is essential to give the correct value of I.

d. Shouldn't J=I/Area^2 in terms of units.

Yes, and it is. Or rather, J = I/Area. Remember that delta functions carry reciprocal units. So you get 1/L from the factor of 1/a, and another 1/L from the factor of \delta(r' - a).
 
Thanks a lot :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
16K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K