What Are the Correct Formulas and Units for These Physics Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IKnowGravity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulas
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the correct formulas and units for various physics equations, particularly concerning the mass of light and the forces between charged particles. The participants debate the validity of the formula for mass derived from Planck's constant and frequency, suggesting a modification involving 2π. Additionally, they explore the calculation of acceleration for charged particles in a simulation, emphasizing the need for precise increments over time. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity in scientific notation and the correct application of physical laws.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck's constant and its application in physics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of force and acceleration in electromagnetism
  • Knowledge of basic kinematics and simulation techniques
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate mathematical formulas in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of modifying Planck's constant in mass calculations
  • Study the principles of electromagnetic force and its mathematical representation
  • Learn about numerical methods for simulating particle motion in physics
  • Explore the relationship between acceleration, force, and distance in classical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in theoretical physics, and developers working on simulations of particle dynamics will benefit from this discussion.

IKnowGravity
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Explanation of what is what in the formula and the unit in which they are in.

The force between two charges.

The centrifugal force between two rotating masses.

The r * r in that equation is it the radie or the diameter? I mean the length.


The mass of light. There are two versions.

Which one is right?

mass = h Planck konstant*f frequnsy
----------------------------
c * c

The Planck konstant can be modified to be divided by 2pi.

Should it? It would seem so if compared by the maximum mass a light photon can have.

mass = h Planck konstant*f frequnsy
----------------------------
c * 2 * pi c


Aslo the formula for an accelerating charge.

Charged partickles with mass are atrakted to each other and I am going to do an computer simulation.
How musch should the accelerating xyz be incremented per time unit?

The smaller time period the smaller increment in their trajektories.

F = something.

A Acceleration = (mass1 +mass2 )*time* q1 * q2
------------------------------
distans between them


X led The acceleration is modified each interval in x and y and z led. +
or minus a ceartain element.
y led
z led

This acceleration x is then added to the x position of the partickle.
This acceleration y is then added to the y position of the partickle.
This acceleration z is then added to the z position of the partickle.

Is this right?

Have i forgotten something. Help is greatly apreciated.

Christopher. :-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "the maximum mass a light photon can have"...?
And where did u get that:
"A Acceleration = (mass1 +mass2 )*time* q1 * q2
------------------------------
distans between them


"

It looks terribly incorrect.

Daniel.
 
.. and you spelt a whole load of stuff wrong :/.
 
Forget the spelling.It's something secundary.Looks like a mixing with German...And how does he add acceleration with distance...?

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
596
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K