What are the different methods for solving an inequality?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter EngWiPy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around various methods for solving the inequality \(\frac{2x-5}{x-2}<1\). Participants explore different approaches, analyze potential mistakes in reasoning, and clarify the implications of multiplying by expressions that may be positive or negative.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants point out that multiplying both sides of the inequality by \(x-2\) is problematic without knowing the sign of \(x-2\), leading to different cases based on its positivity or negativity.
  • One suggested method involves solving the corresponding equation \(\frac{2x-5}{x-2}=1\) to identify critical points that divide the real line into intervals for testing.
  • Another approach proposed is to rearrange the inequality to \(\frac{2x-5}{x-2} - 1 < 0\) and analyze the resulting fraction \(\frac{x-3}{x-2}<0\).
  • Participants discuss splitting the analysis into cases based on whether \(x-2\) is greater than or less than zero, leading to different solution sets.
  • One participant mentions multiplying both sides by \((x-2)^2\) to avoid issues with negative multiplication, resulting in a quadratic inequality.
  • Several participants arrive at the solution set \(2

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on a single method for solving the inequality, as participants propose multiple valid approaches and highlight different aspects of the reasoning involved. Disagreements exist regarding the implications of multiplying by expressions that may change sign.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering cases based on the sign of \(x-2\) and the potential for different solutions depending on the method used. Some methods may lead to different interpretations of the inequality's solution set.

EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Hello,

Where is the mistake in the following solution of the inequality:

[tex]\begin{align*}<br /> &\frac{2x-5}{x-2}<1\\<br /> &2x-5<x-2\\<br /> &x<3, x\ne 2<br /> \end{align}[/tex]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
S_David said:
Hello,

Where is the mistake in the following solution of the inequality:
The following is not true:
If a<b, then ac<bc​

In fact you have three separate cases, depending on c -- do you know what they are?
 
Hurkyl's point is that you multiplied both sides of the inequality by x- 2 and, since you don't know what x is, you don't know if x- 2 is positive or negative. (Oops, I just gave you two of the three cases Hurkyl asked about!)

My preferred method for solving anything more than linear inequalities is to first solve the corresponding equation. Here, solve [tex]\frac{2x-5}{x-2}= 1[/itex]. The "x" that satisfies that and the "x" that makes the denominator 0 are the only places where the inequality can "change". They divide the real line into three intervals- check one point in each interval to see which give ">".[/tex]
 
S_David said:
Hello,

Where is the mistake in the following solution of the inequality:

[tex]\begin{align*}<br /> &\frac{2x-5}{x-2}<1\\<br /> &2x-5<x-2\\<br /> &x<3, x\ne 2<br /> \end{align}[/tex]

And why don't you try:

[tex]\frac{2x-5}{x-2} - 1 < 0[/tex]

?

Then consider these cases

[tex]a/b <0[/tex]

should "a" and /or "b" be positive or negative so that the the fraction a/b would be negative?

Regards.
 
S_David said:
Hello,

Where is the mistake in the following solution of the inequality:

[tex]\begin{align*}<br /> &\frac{2x-5}{x-2}<1\\<br /> &2x-5<x-2\\<br /> &x<3, x\ne 2<br /> \end{align}[/tex]

You may split your analysis into two cases:

1) x-2>0,
and

2) x-2<0

You will find that for 2), there are NO solutions, meaning that x must be greater than 2.
 
Another excelent method in this case is to multiply both sides by (x-2)^2, with the squared assuring that we haven't multiplied by a negative number, and then just re-arrange it to give a quadratic inequality : x^2 - 5x + 6 < 0
 
uart said:
Another excelent method in this case is to multiply both sides by (x-2)^2, with the squared assuring that we haven't multiplied by a negative number, and then just re-arrange it to give a quadratic inequality : x^2 - 5x + 6 < 0

Ok, I can see where I did mistake the inequality. So, we have two cases:

[tex]\begin{align}<br /> x-2&>0\\<br /> x-2&<0<br /> \end{align}[/tex]

In the first case the multiplication does not change the direction of the inequality, so:

[tex]\begin{align*}<br /> 2x-5&<x-2\\<br /> x&<3<br /> \end{align}[/tex]

Then the open interval [tex](2,3)[/tex] is the solution set. In the second case, the direction of the inequality changed, so:

[tex]\begin{align*}<br /> 2x-5&>x-2\\<br /> x&>3<br /> \end{align}[/tex]

But [tex]x<2[/tex], then there is no solution.

The solution provided by uart is a good one, too. Where he eliminated the problem of negative sign possibility in the unknown [tex]x[/tex].

Actually, I am reviewing the precalculus and calculus books, and such things I forgot because I don't practice it continousely.

Anyway, thank you all guys.

Best regards
 
You could solve it this way:
[tex] \frac{2x-5}{x-2} - 1 < 0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{x-3}{x-2}<0[/tex]

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}<br /> \left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> x-3<0\\ <br /> x-2>0<br /> \end{matrix}\right.<br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> \left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> x-3>0\\ <br /> x-2<0<br /> \end{matrix}\right.<br /> <br /> \end{matrix}[/tex]

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}<br /> \left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> x<3\\ <br /> x>2<br /> \end{matrix}\right.<br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> \left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> x>3\\ <br /> x<2<br /> \end{matrix}\right.<br /> \end{matrix}[/tex]

Because 3<x<2 is not valid,

the only solution is 2<x<3 or (2,3).

Regards.
 
Дьявол said:
You could solve it this way:
[tex] \frac{2x-5}{x-2} - 1 < 0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{x-3}{x-2}<0[/tex]

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}<br /> \left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> x-3<0\\ <br /> x-2>0<br /> \end{matrix}\right.<br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> \left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> x-3>0\\ <br /> x-2<0<br /> \end{matrix}\right.<br /> <br /> \end{matrix}[/tex]

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}<br /> \left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> x<3\\ <br /> x>2<br /> \end{matrix}\right.<br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> \left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> x>3\\ <br /> x<2<br /> \end{matrix}\right.<br /> \end{matrix}[/tex]

Because 3<x<2 is not valid,

the only solution is 2<x<3 or (2,3).

Regards.

Dear Дьявол,

This method is as described in my calculus book, and yes it is easier than the one I explained earlier. But I wanted to know the different methods to solve the inequality.

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K