What Are the Different Origins of Helium?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the origins of helium, particularly in the context of alpha particle interactions within a vacuum chamber. Participants explore the processes involved in the production of helium from radioactive decay and the behavior of alpha particles when they collide with glass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that alpha particles released from radioactive decay will not simply "bounce around" in a vacuum container but will likely penetrate the glass and lose energy, potentially becoming helium atoms.
  • There is a discussion about whether alpha particles can ionize into helium gas inside the chamber, with some arguing that they would deionize into helium atoms after interacting with the glass.
  • One participant notes that in a vacuum, alpha particles would not ionize or deionize before hitting the walls, as there are no electrons to interact with until they collide with the glass.
  • Participants discuss the mobility of helium atoms, indicating that while helium may be deposited inside the glass, it can diffuse quickly, explaining why helium balloons deflate over time.
  • The term "different origins" is debated, with one participant clarifying that it refers to the processes by which helium is produced, distinguishing between naturally occurring helium and that which is produced from nuclear decay.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of alpha particles in a vacuum and the processes leading to helium formation. There is no consensus on the specifics of these interactions or the implications for helium's origins.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on the definitions of ionization and the context of alpha particle interactions, which may not be fully resolved within the discussion.

connorp
Messages
30
Reaction score
2
As a radioactive sample decays in a glass vacuum container, and the released alpha particles collide with the glass, would it be correct to assume that the particles "bounce around?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They're likely to penetrate the glass and lose their energy along the way becoming helium atoms.
 
Pretty much what he said. For more detail see:
http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/nuctek/interactheavy.html

If by "bounce around" you mean, off the walls of the container - no.
Energetic alphas may scatter off the nuclei, some may back-scatter... but really you expect absorption.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_particle#Energy_and_absorption
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/rutsca2.html

On the scale of the individual alpha, the glass is a kind of fog with hard points in it.

Alpha particle tracks in a cloud chamber:

... illustrates the short range, with deflection/absorption by denser matter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Simon Bridge said:
Pretty much what he said. For more detail see:
http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/nuctek/interactheavy.html

If by "bounce around" you mean, off the walls of the container - no.
Energetic alphas may scatter off the nuclei, some may back-scatter... but really you expect absorption.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_particle#Energy_and_absorption
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/rutsca2.html

On the scale of the individual alpha, the glass is a kind of fog with hard points in it.

Alpha particle tracks in a cloud chamber:

... illustrates the short range, with deflection/absorption by denser matter.

Thanks, just what I was looking for.

So in a man made vacuum, it would be expected for some α-particles to be absorbed by the glass, while others would ionize into helium gas inside the chamber, correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
connorp said:
Thanks, just what I was looking for.

So in a man made vacuum, it would be expected for some α-particles to be absorbed by the glass, while others would ionize into helium gas inside the chamber, correct?

They would deionize into helium atoms inside of the glass.
 
connorp said:
Thanks, just what I was looking for.

So in a man made vacuum, it would be expected for some α-particles to be absorbed by the glass, while others would ionize into helium gas inside the chamber, correct?
Alphas are the same as doubly-ionized helium atoms - different origin though.

In a vacuum chamber there are, in principle, no electrons or anything for the alphas ot inetract with so: no, they would not ionize or deionize or anything before hitting the walls.

When they interact with the atoms in the walls of the chamber - then they would lose kinetic energy and eventually deionize by picking up a couple of the electrons there.

The picture I gave you was for alphas in a cloud chamber - i.e. not a vacuum.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/particles/cloud.html
 
Simon Bridge said:
Alphas are the same as doubly-ionized helium atoms - different origin though.

What do you mean by different origins?
Where do you think helium comes from? (Assuming Earthly sources)
 
And the helium would emerge outside of the chamber or be trapped inside the glass?
 
The helium atom is deposited inside of the glass but won't necessarily stay there. Helium atoms have high mobility and will diffuse fairly fast. That's why helium balloons never last as long as you'd like them to :(
 
  • #10
Ok thanks, you guys have been very helpful.
 
  • #11
dauto said:
What do you mean by different origins?
Immediate origins. Perhaps you prefer "processes"?

"Ionization" is commonly understood as a process rather than a state or configuration.
i.e. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/293007/ionization

In this sense - doubly ionized helium atoms started out with all their electrons (having collected some along the way, and hung around in pockets underground for a while before being dug up, separated out, and bottled, and shipped to the lab or wherever) and then had them removed, while new alphas just emitted from nuclear decay have yet to acquire any electrons.

That's what I mean by "different origins".

Where do you think helium comes from? (Assuming Earthly sources)
Assuming Earthly sources, bearing in mind the above: It mainly comes out of holes in the ground, but I mostly get it from the gasses cupboard at the back of the lab.

One day I saw a tech toting a cylinder of helium, and asked after the origin of that helium.
The tech replied, "It came from the store room."
I explained that this was incorrect, "Surely," said I, "This helium came from nuclear processes under the ground."
The tech replied, "All I know is, it's heavy. If you want to lecture me, you can carry this *** cylinder."
On hearing that, I was enlightened. ;)

But, no worries aye, at least the answers were helpful.
Have fun.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K