connorp
- 30
- 2
As a radioactive sample decays in a glass vacuum container, and the released alpha particles collide with the glass, would it be correct to assume that the particles "bounce around?"
Simon Bridge said:Pretty much what he said. For more detail see:
http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/nuctek/interactheavy.html
If by "bounce around" you mean, off the walls of the container - no.
Energetic alphas may scatter off the nuclei, some may back-scatter... but really you expect absorption.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_particle#Energy_and_absorption
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/rutsca2.html
On the scale of the individual alpha, the glass is a kind of fog with hard points in it.
Alpha particle tracks in a cloud chamber:
... illustrates the short range, with deflection/absorption by denser matter.
connorp said:Thanks, just what I was looking for.
So in a man made vacuum, it would be expected for some α-particles to be absorbed by the glass, while others would ionize into helium gas inside the chamber, correct?
Alphas are the same as doubly-ionized helium atoms - different origin though.connorp said:Thanks, just what I was looking for.
So in a man made vacuum, it would be expected for some α-particles to be absorbed by the glass, while others would ionize into helium gas inside the chamber, correct?
Simon Bridge said:Alphas are the same as doubly-ionized helium atoms - different origin though.
Immediate origins. Perhaps you prefer "processes"?dauto said:What do you mean by different origins?
Assuming Earthly sources, bearing in mind the above: It mainly comes out of holes in the ground, but I mostly get it from the gasses cupboard at the back of the lab.Where do you think helium comes from? (Assuming Earthly sources)