What are the dimensions of e^2/(4*pi*epsilon_0) in terms of energy and distance?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The expression e^2/(4*pi*epsilon_0) has dimensions of energy times distance, derived from Coulomb's law, F = (1/(4*pi*epsilon_0))*(q1*q2/r^2). By rearranging this equation to isolate (1/(4*pi*epsilon_0)) e^2, the resulting units can be expressed as Newtons multiplied by nanometers squared. Recognizing that energy is defined as force times distance clarifies the dimensional relationship, confirming that e^2/(4*pi*epsilon_0) indeed represents energy times distance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's law and its application in electrostatics
  • Understanding of dimensional analysis in physics
  • Basic knowledge of units such as Newtons, electronvolts (eV), and nanometers (nm)
  • Familiarity with the concept of energy as force times distance
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore dimensional analysis techniques in physics
  • Study the relationship between force, energy, and distance in classical mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of Coulomb's law in electrostatics
  • Investigate the conversion of units in physics, specifically between Newtons, eV, and nm
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching electrostatics, and researchers analyzing energy relationships in particle physics will benefit from this discussion.

eku_girl83
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Here's my question:
Starting from Coulomb's law, show that e^2/(4*pi*epsilon_0) has dimensions of energy times distance.

Coulombs law is F=(1/(4*pi*episilon_0))*(q1*q2/r^2)
I understand how to convert the units for e^2/(4*pi*epsilon_0), where e is the charge of the electron, to ev * nm.
Could someone explain how I can use this in conjunction with Coulomb's law to answer the question above?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with Coulomb's law:
F = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} e^2/r^2
Now rearrange it to solve for \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} e^2.
Does that help?
 
When I do that, I get units of Newtons * (nanometers)^2 Is there any way that I can convert this into units of energy * distance?
 
You may be better off thinking in terms of dimensions instead of specific units.

Another hint: Energy has dimension of Force x Distance.
 
Thanks for helping! I figured out two more dimensional analysis type problems on my own!
I guess sometimes it's easier to work with dimensions than actual units? :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
556
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K