B What are the energy eigenvalues of a harmonic oscillator?

Lotto
Messages
251
Reaction score
16
TL;DR Summary
I have this formula ##E_n=hf\left(n+\frac 12 \right)##. I don't understand what energy it describes.
Is it a total energy of a vibrating molecule? So is it a sum of potential and kinetic energy? Or it is only a total energy of a vibrational motion of the molecule? Or is it only a potencial energy, when it is related to a dissociation curve? I am confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lotto said:
TL;DR Summary: I have this formula ##E_n=hf\left(n+\frac 12 \right)##. I don't understand what energy it describes.

Is it a total energy of a vibrating molecule? So is it a sum of potential and kinetic energy? Or it is only a total energy of a vibrational motion of the molecule? Or is it only a potencial energy, when it is related to a dissociation curve? I am confused.
It looks the energy levels of an ideal harmonic oscillator, and will be the sum of the potential and kinetic energy of the oscillator. How this relates to a vibrating molecule depends on how accurately the molecule can be modeled as an ideal harmonic oscillator.

In general, we know what energies are involved by looking at the Hamiltonian that we started with. In the case of the ideal harmonic oscillator, that Hamiltonian contains a kinetic energy term and a potential energy term.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, gentzen, PeroK and 4 others
Indeed, these are the energy eigenvalues of a harmonic oscillator. It describes the conserved total energy of the oscillator, when it is prepared in a state of determined energy. The possible values of this total energy are the eigenvalues of the Hamilton operator,
$$\hat{H}=\frac{1}{2m} \hat{p}^2 + \frac{m \omega^2}{2} \hat{x}^2.$$
The energy eigenvalues are
$$E_n=h f \left (n+\frac{1}{2} \right) = \hbar \omega \left (n+\frac{1}{2} \right), \quad n \in \{0,1,2,3,\ldots \}=\mathbb{N}_0,$$
where ##\hbar=h/(2 \pi)## is the "modified quantum of action/Planck's constant)". Nowadays almost nobody uses the original ##h## anymore.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top