Demystifier
Science Advisor
- 14,605
- 7,213
If you are pointing out that these weakly measured trajectories do not prove that Bohmian interpretation is correct, then I agree.unusualname said:I mean that all QM models would predict the trajectories if the correct calculations are carried out (maybe the Bohm calculation is more efficient, but doesn't mean zilch regarding Nature)
and so BM adherents need something much more convincing, like a (anti) Bell type argument to show determinism is possible. ie construct an experiment where pre-existing properties can be proved to have existed.
There is no such problem for BM. First, BM contains wave functions which DO have spin degrees of freedom. Second, when spin is measured, e.g., by Stern-Gerlach apparatus, then what is really measured is not spin as such, but a position of a particle.unusualname said:And of course you have the HUGE problem of explaining the Standard Model from BM, which will be difficult since BM doesn't even have concept of quantum spin degree of freedom.
For more details see also
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1205.1992 (a chapter in a published book)