What are the implications of this experiment?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter StevieTNZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent experiment conducted by researchers at the University of Toronto successfully mapped the trajectories of single photons in a double-slit interferometer using weak measurements. This approach allows for the simultaneous observation of both the particle and wave nature of light, challenging traditional interpretations of quantum mechanics, particularly the many-worlds interpretation. However, the results do not provide definitive information about the path of individual photons, reinforcing the notion that quantum particles do not have well-defined trajectories. The findings align with standard quantum mechanics and suggest that Bohmian trajectories may not be hidden variables but integral to quantum mechanics itself.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave-particle duality.
  • Familiarity with weak measurements and their implications in quantum physics.
  • Knowledge of the double-slit experiment and its historical significance in quantum theory.
  • Awareness of various interpretations of quantum mechanics, including the Copenhagen and many-worlds interpretations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of weak measurements in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of Bohmian mechanics and its relation to quantum interpretations.
  • Study the double-slit experiment in detail, focusing on its role in demonstrating wave-particle duality.
  • Examine the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and its relevance to quantum measurements.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the foundational aspects of quantum theory and the implications of recent experimental findings on photon behavior.

  • #271
unusualname said:
I mean that all QM models would predict the trajectories if the correct calculations are carried out (maybe the Bohm calculation is more efficient, but doesn't mean zilch regarding Nature)
and so BM adherents need something much more convincing, like a (anti) Bell type argument to show determinism is possible. ie construct an experiment where pre-existing properties can be proved to have existed.
If you are pointing out that these weakly measured trajectories do not prove that Bohmian interpretation is correct, then I agree.

unusualname said:
And of course you have the HUGE problem of explaining the Standard Model from BM, which will be difficult since BM doesn't even have concept of quantum spin degree of freedom.
There is no such problem for BM. First, BM contains wave functions which DO have spin degrees of freedom. Second, when spin is measured, e.g., by Stern-Gerlach apparatus, then what is really measured is not spin as such, but a position of a particle.

For more details see also
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1205.1992 (a chapter in a published book)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K