What are the main branches of physics?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Avichal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of physics into its main branches and sub-fields. Participants explore various criteria for categorizing physics, including theoretical frameworks, professional sub-fields, and the motivations behind studying different topics within physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that physics can be classified based on the topics studied, such as Mechanics for particle motion and Electromagnetism for the forces that cause motion.
  • Another participant argues that "branches of physics" should refer to professional sub-fields like condensed matter physics and cosmology, which integrate multiple theories.
  • A different viewpoint highlights that classification can vary, mentioning that Classical Mechanics can involve concepts from electrodynamics and gravity, and that wave mechanics has been consolidated into a single course in some educational programs.
  • One participant notes that classifying physics is subjective, with different individuals categorizing it based on various criteria.
  • Another participant expresses interest in classifying physics based on the underlying motives of inquiry, questioning what topics would fall under such a classification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there are multiple ways to classify physics, but no consensus is reached on a single classification system. The discussion reflects differing perspectives on how to categorize the subject.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the influence of historical discoveries on classification and the subjective nature of categorization, indicating that definitions and classifications may depend on individual perspectives and educational backgrounds.

Avichal
Messages
294
Reaction score
0
I am basically listing out all topics in science (natural science) and was looking at branches of physics.

Wikipedia says that physics can broadly be classified into following: - Classical Mechanics, Relativity, Quantum Theory, Thermodynamics and Electromagnetism.
On what basis is this done?
Can we classify physics on the basis of what are we studying. E.g. how particles move is Mechanics, what makes them move is Electromagnetism and gravity, what happens at microscopic level is Quantum Theory ... something like this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you have listed are theories or subjects in physics.

When I think of "branches of physics" I think more of sub-fields that professionals work in. Like condensed matter physics, high energy particle physics, cosmology, quantum optics and information, biological physics, etc. Each of these sub-fields draws on multiple theories and subjects in physics.
 
There is probably more than one way to classify topics.

In Classical Mechanics we basically learned to use differential equations to express particle motion, generally starting with Newton's 2nd or conservation. It can even involve electrodynamics and gravity, just as long as the focus is on particle motion via acting forces.

When I was graduating my physics program, they actually took all the wave study from classical mechanics, EnM, and QM, and put them in one class called wave mechanics, and took all the mathematics and put them in a mathematical physics courses (whereas when I took classes, classical mechanics and EM and QM were each two semester classes).

EnM can all reduced to Maxwell's Equations, which can be reduced to the d'Alembertian, so that justifies making it a single subject... but you would also see some special relativity and classical mechanics in the class.

QM is obviously separable given the completely new conceptual approach (observables are now operators, discretization, etc.) Also a lot of new math compared to classical. (Now need some probability and linear algebra).

Nonlinear dynamics I tend to think of as branch of modern physics (alongside GR and QM).

Computational physics is more about the approach; it involves systems where there is no analytical solutions, requiring computation to find numerical solutions. Can be applied to any of the other topics.
 
After googling a bit, I realized that classifying physics is very subjective. Different people categorize on different basis.
As you said, it can also be categorized according to sub-fields professional work. Similarly I think you can divide it in many other ways.

EDIT: I see that Pythagorean posted the same thing before me
 
If you were to classify physics based on what we are actually trying to find, then what would be the topics? For eg:- If we are trying to find how particles move then it would be Mechanics, when particles move then it would include the forces i.e. gravity and electromagnetism ... and similarly.
So based on this criteria what would be the topics?

I like to divide my subject based on the motive. Wikipedia and other sources usually categorizes on the basis of historical discoveries.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 190 ·
7
Replies
190
Views
17K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K