What are the mathematical origins of i^i=e^(pi/2)?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter thharrimw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematical Roots
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical expression \(i^i = e^{\pi/2}\) and its origins. Participants explore the implications of this equation, the properties of the imaginary unit \(i\), and related mathematical identities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests clarification on the origin of the equation \(i^i = e^{\pi/2}\).
  • Another participant references a Wikipedia article as a source for understanding the imaginary unit.
  • A different participant challenges the validity of the equation, claiming \(i^i = 0.20787\) and \(e^{\pi/2} = 4.81047\), suggesting a missing negative sign in the original claim.
  • This participant provides a series of mathematical steps to argue that \(e^{\pi/2} = i^{-i}\), based on properties of exponentiation and the imaginary unit.
  • One participant expresses discomfort with the assertion that \(i^{1/i}\) is equivalent to \(i^{-i}\), suggesting a potential misunderstanding of exponentiation rules.
  • Another participant acknowledges the clarification regarding \(1/i\) equating to \(-i\), expressing appreciation for the insight.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the validity of the equation \(i^i = e^{\pi/2}\), with some asserting it is incorrect while others provide mathematical reasoning to support it. The discussion remains unresolved with competing views on the interpretation of the expressions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference properties of exponentiation and the imaginary unit, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the handling of complex numbers and their powers. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the correctness of the claims made.

thharrimw
Messages
114
Reaction score
0

could someone tell me where the i^i=e^(pi/2) came from??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ha. They're wrong. [itex]i^i[/itex]=0.20787 and [itex]e^{\pi/2}[/itex]=4.81047. They're missing a negative sign. Remember that taking the square root of something is the same thing as raising that something to the 1/2 power. Then [itex]\sqrt{-1} = i = (-1)^{1/2}[/itex]. Also, 1/i=-i. Then
[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> e^{i\pi}+1 &= 0 \\<br /> e^{i\pi} &= -1 \\<br /> \left( e^{i\pi} \right)^{1/2} &= (-1)^{1/2} \\<br /> e^{i\pi/2} &= i \\<br /> \left( e^{i\pi/2} \right)^{1/i} &= i^{1/i} \\<br /> e^{\pi/2} &= i^{-i}<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]
 
I do not like the idea that [tex]i ^{\frac{1}{i}}[/tex] is [tex]i ^{-i}[/tex]. I would of thought it would be [tex]i ^{i^{-1}}[/tex] which are not the same thing as far as I know.
 
It is true that most often they are not the same, however for i they are.

Proof:
[tex] \frac{1}{i}=\frac{i}{i^2}=\frac{i}{-1}=-i[/tex]
 
Oh cool, I didn't know that. That is pretty nice to know. And it makes sense when put like that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K