MHB What are the positive values for a in the equation a^x=x+2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vali
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation a^x = x + 2 has two real solutions, and the discussion focuses on identifying the positive values for "a" that allow this. It is established that for a > 1, the function decreases from infinity to -1 and then increases, leading to two intersection points with the line y = x + 2. For values of a between 0 and 1, only one intersection point exists due to the opposite slopes of the graphs. The second derivative test is discussed, indicating that for a to yield two roots, it must be greater than 1. The use of Lambert's W function is also mentioned as a method to explore solutions further.
Vali
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Sorry for posting again but I need to prepare for exam.
a^x=x+2 has two real solutions.I need to find positive values for "a".
A) (1, infinity)
B) (0,1)
C) (1/e , e)
D) (1/(e^e), e^e)
E) (e^(1/e), infinity)
I tried to solve and I did it but I don't understand some things.
I let a picture below to see.
First, I need to know if there's other way to solve this kind of exercise.I would be happy if I would get some ideas.
Also, from my solution, I don't understand why from that table results just one solution and from the graphic results two solutions.Usually, to see the number of solutions I use this kind of table.
For a>1 f decrease from infinity to -1, then increase from -1 to infinity.I'm really confused.Need some indications here.
Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • expo.jpg
    expo.jpg
    42.5 KB · Views: 108
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would begin with:

$$f(x)=a^x-x-2$$

Hence, let's examine:

$$f'(x)=a^x\ln(a)-1$$

$$f''(x)=a^x\ln^2(a)$$

Now, in order for \(f(x)\) to have 2 roots, we require upward concavity, that is we require:

$$f''(x)<0$$

Can you finish?
 
Hi Vali,

You have a mistake for $a<1$ where you took the example $a=-e$.
Admittedly $-e < 1$, but $a^x$ is not defined for negative $a$.
So we should pick $0<a<1$. We can pick for instance $a=\frac 1e$ so that we get $a^x=(\frac 1e)^x = e^{-x}$.

To understand better what's going on, let's draw a couple of graphs.

\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.6]
\begin{scope}
\draw[help lines] (-4,-2) grid (4,5);
\draw[<->] (-4.4,0) -- (4.4,0) node
{$x$};
\draw[<->] (0,-2.2) -- (0,5.2) node[above] {$y$};
\draw foreach \i in {-4,-3,-2,-1,1,2,3,4} { (\i,0.1) -- (\i,-0.1) node[below] {$\i$} };
\draw foreach \i in {-2,-1,1,2,3,4,5} { (0.1,\i) -- (-0.1,\i) node
{$\i$} };
\draw[domain=-4:2.2, variable=\x, red, ultra thick] plot ({\x}, {(\x+2)}) node
{$y=x+2$};
\draw[domain=-4:1.6, variable=\x, blue, ultra thick] plot ({\x}, {exp(\x)}) node
{$y=a^x, a>1$};
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}[xshift=10cm]
\draw[help lines] (-4,-2) grid (4,5);
\draw[<->] (-4.4,0) -- (4.4,0) node
{$x$};
\draw[<->] (0,-2.2) -- (0,5.2) node[above] {$y$};
\draw foreach \i in {-4,-3,-2,-1,1,2,3,4} { (\i,0.1) -- (\i,-0.1) node[below] {$\i$} };
\draw foreach \i in {-2,-1,1,2,3,4,5} { (0.1,\i) -- (-0.1,\i) node
{$\i$} };
\draw[domain=-4:2.2, variable=\x, red, ultra thick] plot ({\x}, {(\x+2)}) node[above] {$y=x+2$};
\draw[domain=-4:3, variable=\x, blue, ultra thick] plot ({\x}, {1}) node[above] {$y=a^x, a=1$};
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}[xshift=20cm]
\draw[help lines] (-4,-2) grid (4,5);
\draw[<->] (-4.4,0) -- (4.4,0) node
{$x$};
\draw[<->] (0,-2.2) -- (0,5.2) node[above] {$y$};
\draw foreach \i in {-4,-3,-2,-1,1,2,3,4} { (\i,0.1) -- (\i,-0.1) node[below] {$\i$} };
\draw foreach \i in {-2,-1,1,2,3,4,5} { (0.1,\i) -- (-0.1,\i) node
{$\i$} };
\draw[domain=-4:2.2, variable=\x, red, ultra thick] plot ({\x}, {(\x+2)}) node
{$y=x+2$};
\draw[domain=-1.6:3, variable=\x, blue, ultra thick] plot ({\x}, {exp(-\x)}) node[above right] {$y=a^x, 0<a<1$};
\end{scope}
\end{tikzpicture}

Note that the line $y=x+2$ intersects the y-axis at $2$, which is always above the $1$ where $y=a^x$ intersects the y-axis.
The cases are:
  • For $a>1$, the graph of $y=a^x$ always slopes upwards exponentially so that it will always overtake the line.
    In other words, we always have 2 intersection points.
  • For $a=1$ we have indeed always 1 intersection point as we have 2 intersecting lines.
  • For $0<a<1$ we also have always 1 intersection point since the graphs have opposite slopes.
    As you can see, this is different from what you had, as $a$ must be positive for a proper definition of $a^x$.
  • For $a=0$ (not drawn) $a^x$ is only defined for positive $x$ where it is $0$, so no intersection points.
    We can't divide by $0$ after all.
  • For $a<0$ the expression $a^x$ is undefined for real $x$. We can't take roots (at e.g. $x=\frac 12$) of negative numbers after all.
I hope this clarifies a bit and gives you a different way to look at the problem! ;)​
 
Thank you for your help!I understood.

I try to understand the method with second derivative.
f''(x) < 0 has no solution for x real.
 
By the way, letting y= x+ 2, the equation becomes

[math]a^{y-2}= a^{-2}a^y= a^{-2}e^{ln(a^y)}= a^{-2}e^{yln(a)}= y[/math].

Letting z= y ln(a), a^{-2}e^{z}= \frac{z}{ln(a)}. ze^{-z}= a^{-2}ln(a). Finally, letting u= -z, ue^u= -a^{-2}ln(a). Then u= W(-a^{-2}ln(a)) where W is "Lambert's W function", the inverse to f(x)= xe^x.

Then z= -W(-a^{-2}ln(a)), y= -\frac{W(-a^{-2}ln(a))}{ln(a)}, x= -\frac{W(-a^{-2}ln(a))}{ln(a)}- 2.

Of course, since the W function can be multivalued, that does not answer the original question!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top