MHB What are the steps to solving simultaneous equations using substitution?

blackfriars
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
hi could anyone help with this one as i do not know the steps to take . as far as i know you can only use substitution
4y^2-3x^2=1
x-2y=1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
4y^2-3x^2=1
x-2y=1

line intersecting a hyperbola ...

$x = 2y+1 \implies 4y^2 - 3(2y+1)^2 = 1$

can you solve the resulting quadratic in $y$?
 
hi skeeter, thanks for the reply i have used desmos and geo gebra and the intersection points ere (-1,-1)and (0,-0.5)
now i was able to get the (-1,-1) but for the quadratic i was getting (-1/2,-3/4)
this is what i did

-8y^2-12y-4=0
----------------------
-4

2y^2+3y+1=0

using the formula a=2,b=3,c=-4
the intersections i should have got were (-1,-1) and (0,-0.5)
hope you can help to show where i went wrong thanks
 
Let's start where skeeter left off:

$$4y^2-3(2y+1)^2=1$$

Expand squared binomial:

$$4y^2-3\left(4y^2+4y+1\right)=1$$

Distribute the -3:

$$4y^2-12y^2-12y-3=1$$

Collect like terms:

$$-8y^2-12y-4=0$$

Divide through by -4:

$$2y^2+3y+1=0$$

This is what you have, but when you went to apply the quadratic formula, you used $c=-4$ instead of $c=1$.

Factor:

$$(2y+1)(y+1)=0$$

Hence:

$$y\in\left\{-1,-\frac{1}{2}\right\}$$

Now with $x=2y+1$, this gives us the solutions:

$$(x,y)=(-1,-1),\,\left(0,-\frac{1}{2}\right)$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top