What are the top toys that can run almost perpetually?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ogulnius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Perpetual motion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of almost perpetual motion and its application in toy design. Key examples of devices that can run for extended periods include the Crookes radiometer, drinking bird, Atmos clock, Beverly Clock, Oxford Electric Bell, and the Clock of the Long Now. The conversation highlights the distinction between closed systems, which use a fixed energy input, and open systems that harness ambient energy sources like sunlight and wind. Participants explore the feasibility of creating simple, toy-like devices that utilize these energy sources, such as solar-powered toys and self-contained objects that could run indefinitely.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of energy systems: closed vs. open systems
  • Familiarity with solar energy applications in toys
  • Basic knowledge of thermodynamics and heat engines
  • Awareness of perpetual motion concepts and their limitations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research solar-powered toy designs and their mechanisms
  • Explore the principles of thermodynamics in heat engines
  • Investigate the functionality of Crookes radiometers and their applications
  • Learn about the design and operation of self-sustaining devices
USEFUL FOR

Inventors, educators, hobbyists, and anyone interested in the intersection of physics and toy design, particularly those exploring sustainable energy solutions in playful applications.

Ogulnius
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Perpetual motion is fundamentally impossible. But almost perpetual motion is possible.
The list of toys or devices designed to run for a very long time is short: crookes radiometer (photons, cheap), the drinking bird (heat engine, cheap), the Atmos clock (temperature, expensive), Beverly Clock (temperature, unique), Oxford Electric Bell (battery, unique), and, of course, the only really long term object, the clock of the long now (human interference, unique).
Nothing runs on magnetic flux,as far as I know. Of electrostatics, only the Oxford Bell, which depends on a physical battery, not a natural, universally accessible power source.
Photons, of course, if linked to a battery, in a sunny place. Or wind, or tides, or geothermal. Or satellites.
I'm specifically looking for real objects at the "toy" scale, or ideas that could be made as toys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're got two very different categories there.

The first category is of devices that are closed: they have a fixed input of energy that they use very judiciously.
The second is of devices that are open: they rely on "free" sources of ambient energy such as sunlight, wind or tides.

That covers a pretty broad range.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and berkeman
Thanks for your reply. Aren't all systems, ultimately, closed, and that's why perpetual motion is impossible? But I agree. From a toy's point of view, or cool physics, relying on a battery is not very interesting, even though since 1840. In its favor, that is 179 years, so it gets huge points just for existing.
Sunlight, wind or tides are possible sources, but I think only sunlight, in crookes radiometer, exists as a toy-like device. And, because it doesn't store energy in a battery, it demonstrates its perpetual motion defect--doesn't work when the sun don't shine.
The drinking bird, given a very large volume of water and the right atmospherics, would run for a very long time. As would all the clocks, but they are unique or extremely expensive.
Can't we imagine a simple, cheap device that runs on available, if minute, energy fluxes?
 
Soil lamp is an example of something that would run for a long time, but not toy-like, or elegant.
 
I'd be delighted by a self-contained object, in my house, that would run for my lifetime.
 
Could you make a simple toy-like seismometer? It might pick up wiggles as you walk around the house.

I have a solar powered watch that gets enough light indoors to run indefinitely.

How about a barometer or a thermometer?
 
Solar-powered calculators are common.
 
I got it. Solar powered flowers, or similar toys are sold in the dollar store. They jiggle in a cute way.

245725
 
A vat of colored superfluids set on a coffee table in the latitudes of the USA. Swirling vortices should keep spinning until the Earth itself stops.
Perpetual lava lamp, how 1970's.
 
  • #10
Torbert said:
A vat of colored superfluids set on a coffee table in the latitudes of the USA. Swirling vortices should keep spinning until the Earth itself stops.
Perpetual lava lamp, how 1970's.
I really like that. It would be very cool. But are there any room temperature superfluids?
 
  • #11
It would be kind of boring as a conversation piece. It would take 24 hours to make one rotation.
 
  • #12
Perpetual motion is possible in vacuum (e.g space) under the presence of only one field and of course we give the object some momentum.
 
  • #13
GreatestPhysician99 said:
Perpetual motion is possible in vacuum (e.g space) under the presence of only one field and of course we give the object some momentum.
By "only one field" you posit an ideal (physically-impossible) scenario, free of real-world effects.

Even Wiki won't let you get away with that:

"...the motions and rotations of celestial bodies such as planets may appear perpetual, but are actually subject to many processes that slowly dissipate their kinetic energy, such as solar wind, interstellar medium resistance, gravitational radiation and thermal radiation, so they will not keep moving forever ..."
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and davenn
  • #14
GreatestPhysician99 said:
Perpetual motion is possible in vacuum (e.g space) under the presence of only one field and of course we give the object some momentum.
good try, but you won't succeed
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nsaspook
  • #15
davenn said:
good try, but you won't succeed
Why can't I succeed?Space is almost empty.
 
  • #16
GreatestPhysician99 said:
Why can't I succeed?Space is almost empty.
See post 13.
 
  • #17
GreatestPhysician99 said:
Why can't I succeed?Space is almost empty.
You can almost succeed. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50

Similar threads

  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
12K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K