What Are the Units of the Fourier Transform's Vertical Axis?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the units of the vertical axis in a Fourier transform plot, specifically when the horizontal axis represents frequency. The vertical axis, representing the Fourier transform's output, is derived from the definition and results in units of volt-seconds, which aligns with Parseval's theorem. Participants note that while the transform itself is complex and unitless, its squared modulus yields power per Hertz. The relationship between these units suggests a connection to energy, though the exact interpretation can vary. Overall, the Fourier transform provides insights into the power distribution across frequencies.
daviddoria
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
If i have a signal S(t) (the plot would be voltage vs time) and I take its Fourier transform, what are the units of the vertical axis? The horizontal axis can either be frequency in hertz or in radians, but what about the other axis? I guess generally I plot the magnitude of the transform since its not always real, but it should still have a unit, no?

Thanks,

David
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is an interesting question. I use Fourier transforms all the time, but never stopped to think about that. If you look at the definition of the Fourier transform:
X(\omega )=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty } e^{-i t \omega } x(t) \, dt
then you see that e^{-i t \omega } is unitless and dt has units of time, so it would seem that if x(t) has units of volts then X(\omega ) must have units of volt seconds.

This is consistent with Parseval's theorem \int_{-\infty }^{\infty } |x(t)|^2 \, dt=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }<br /> |X(\omega )|^2 \, d\omega where each side would wind up with units of volt^2 seconds.
 
Last edited:
Is Volt*seconds somehow equal to energy? Non-technically speaking, the Fourier transform shows you the "strength" (energy or power or something else?) at each frequency, right? So then the units should be related to energy in a very straight forward way. I've just never seen Volt*seconds before.

Thoughts?

David
 
If you take the squared modulus of the Fourier transform result, you get power per Hertz. The transform result itself is imaginary, and thus has no physical units.

- Warren
 
Last edited:
Power in a resistive circuit is volt^2/ohm so you cannot take the units too literally for energy. But as chroot said a volt^2 second is proportional to a volt^2/Hertz. So the squared magnitude of the transform is proportional to power/Hertz.
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K