What Balances the Gyroscope's Gravitational and Precession Torques?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shivanand
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubts Gyroscope
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the dynamics of a gyroscope, specifically addressing the balance of gravitational and precession torques. It clarifies that there is no vertical gravitational torque; instead, the gravitational torque acts as the precessional torque, which does not have a balancing force. The relationship between the resisting torque against gravity and the gyroscope's spin rate and gravitational torque is explored, concluding that larger gravitational forces lead to faster precession while greater angular momentum results in slower precession. The effects of friction on the gyroscope's angular velocity are acknowledged, noting that it ultimately causes the wheel to tilt down. Understanding these principles is essential for grasping gyroscopic motion.
Shivanand
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Gyroscope doubts. Please answer :)

Consider the case of a common demonstration which you would find in videos. A bicycle wheel mounted on a shaft is set into rotation, axis is made horizontal and the shaft stays horizontal for sometime and eventually goes down as the wheel spin slows down due to friction.

Like this one : http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8H98BgRzpOM

My questions are

1) What torque balances the gravitational torque vertically and the precession torque horizontally (applying Newton's second law) ?

2) Let the torque resisting the vertical fall of shaft be R and torque due to gravity be T. Since the shaft finally tilts down is R more than T and why does this happen?

3) How is the resisting torque (against gravity) R dependent on
a)Rate of spin
b)Gravitational torque T ?

Please answer these questions :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org


In short, the angular momentum is what causes it to stay up.

Forces alter the linear momentum vector (p). Torques alter the angular momentum vector (L). Looking at a gyroscope, the angular momentum is pointed up in some direction. The radius vector is pointed in the same direction as the angular momentum towards the center of mass. The force due to gravity is pointing down from the center of mass. The torque is then:

\tau = r\timesF

Which, using the right hand rule, acts perpendicular to both the force and radius vectors which points the torque sideways. The torque "pulls" on L. \tau is always pependicular to L; this is circular motion.

Obviously, this only works if the angular momentum is strong enough to counteract the gravitational force. Friction will eventually slow down the angular velocity.

1. There is no vertical gravitational torque; it points sideways. The gravitational torque is the precessional torque, and nothing balances it. So the gyroscope spins.

2. Remember, torques are orthogonal to forces. It can be difficult to grasp this concept at first, but that is the difference maker.

3. There is no resisting torque as I said earlier, but the larger the gravitational force, the faster the precession. The larger the angular momentum, the slower the precession.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
777
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
6K