What Branch of Physics Deals with Renewable or Clean Energy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around identifying the branch of physics relevant to renewable or clean energy sources, exploring the necessary prerequisites and mathematical foundations for a self-taught student interested in this field. It touches on theoretical and applied aspects of physics and engineering.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the focus should be more on engineering than physics when it comes to renewable energy.
  • Another participant recommends starting with Thermodynamics and pursuing applied physics, specifically in chemical, electrical, or mechanical engineering, while advising against theoretical physics for practical applications.
  • There is a query about the necessary mathematical background for studying thermodynamics and applied physics, with a focus on derivatives and integration techniques.
  • A response emphasizes the importance of more analytical math courses, including complex analysis, differential equations, and linear algebra, while noting that fluid mechanics is only necessary if one intends to specialize in that area.
  • Further elaboration suggests that students should consider their specific interests within energy production, as different fields such as Chemical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Fluid Dynamics diverge in focus during undergraduate studies.
  • A participant expresses gratitude for the advice and indicates a plan to study thermodynamics and the recommended mathematics, while preparing for vector calculus.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance of physics versus engineering in the context of renewable energy, and there is no consensus on the specific mathematical prerequisites needed for studying thermodynamics and applied physics.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the lack of clarity on the depth of understanding required for fluid mechanics and the varying paths within energy production that may influence educational choices.

EnricoHendro
Messages
80
Reaction score
11
Hello there,

I am interested in renewable or clean or new energy sources. What branch of physics that I need to focus on in order to get a deep understanding on this? Also, what prerequisites do I need?

p.s. I am a self taught student, so I don't have any academic advisor
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is more engineering than physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50, DaveE and EnricoHendro
You can start with Thermodynamics. As you study you will be able to chart the proper course based on your interests. Aim for applied physics; chemical, electrical or mechanical engineering, stay away from theoretical physics it's pretty much useless to people that want to build things.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and EnricoHendro
DaveE said:
You can start with Thermodynamics. As you study you will be able to chart the proper course based on your interests. Aim for applied physics; chemical, electrical or mechanical engineering, stay away from theoretical physics it's pretty much useless to people that want to build things.
I see. What mathematics do I need to cover in order to study thermo and applied physics? I am comfortable with derivatives and integration techniques. And also, do I need to have a deep understanding of fluid mechanics? Or is fluid mechanics covered in the intro physics books enough?
 
EnricoHendro said:
I see. What mathematics do I need to cover in order to study thermo and applied physics? I am comfortable with derivatives and integration techniques. And also, do I need to have a deep understanding of fluid mechanics? Or is fluid mechanics covered in the intro physics books enough?
More analytical math courses. Complex analysis (stokes theroem, green's functions, vector calculus, etc.), differential equations, and linear algebra. The "pure math" classes (Group Theory, etc.) are not so important. You only need fluid mechanics if you want to work in that area. It is definitely not covered in the first couple of years of university physics. But, you don't have to decide that yet.

For now focus on thermodynamics, complex analysis, dynamics. Also, start thinking about what area you want to focus on: Chemical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Fluid Dynamics, EE, etc. all start to separate late in an undergraduate curriculum. You just can't learn it all; at least not initially. Many of these decisions are ones that you can make for yourself once you know what direction you want to head in. Energy production covers a wide range. The people that can make power from waves in the ocean are not the same people that will invent the next solar cell, make a better wind generator, or improve carbon capture systems.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EnricoHendro
DaveE said:
More analytical math courses. Complex analysis (stokes theroem, green's functions, vector calculus, etc.), differential equations, and linear algebra. The "pure math" classes (Group Theory, etc.) are not so important. You only need fluid mechanics if you want to work in that area. It is definitely not covered in the first couple of years of university physics. But, you don't have to decide that yet.

For now focus on thermodynamics, complex analysis, dynamics. Also, start thinking about what area you want to focus on: Chemical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Fluid Dynamics, EE, etc. all start to separate late in an undergraduate curriculum. You just can't learn it all; at least not initially. Many of these decisions are ones that you can make for yourself once you know what direction you want to head in. Energy production covers a wide range. The people that can make power from waves in the ocean are not the same people that will invent the next solar cell, make a better wind generator, or improve carbon capture systems.
Thank you for your advice. I will start digging thermo and the maths that you recommend. I am currently preparing for vector calculus by reviewing the basic calculus to make sure I don’t miss any important thing
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K