What Caused Inflation to Cease in the Early Universe?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter iamaelephant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inflation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The cessation of inflation in the early universe is attributed to the dynamics of a scalar field that transitions from a potential energy-dominated state to one dominated by kinetic energy. Initially, the field is at a local maximum of its potential, leading to accelerated expansion akin to a cosmological constant. As the field rolls down and gains kinetic energy, inflation ceases, transitioning to a radiation-dominated state through a process known as reheating. This shift occurs before the field begins coherent oscillations, ultimately resulting in the universe's reheating into hot radiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of scalar fields in cosmology
  • Familiarity with potential energy and kinetic energy concepts
  • Knowledge of the inflationary model of the universe
  • Basic grasp of Bose-Einstein condensates
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the dynamics of scalar fields in cosmological models
  • Study the process of reheating in the context of inflation
  • Explore the implications of kinetic energy dominance in inflationary scenarios
  • Investigate the role of Bose-Einstein condensates in early universe physics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of cosmology interested in the mechanisms behind the early universe's inflationary period and its subsequent transition to a radiation-dominated state.

iamaelephant
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
So I'm reading about the inflationary period and something occurred to me that never seems to be addressed in the popular physics books - what caused inflation to stop? So I buy the inflation argument, the evidence seems sound, but why would the universe expand so extraordinarily quickly for a tiny fraction of a second and then drop down to a more "reasonable" speed so quickly?
 
Space news on Phys.org
iamaelephant said:
So I'm reading about the inflationary period and something occurred to me that never seems to be addressed in the popular physics books - what caused inflation to stop? So I buy the inflation argument, the evidence seems sound, but why would the universe expand so extraordinarily quickly for a tiny fraction of a second and then drop down to a more "reasonable" speed so quickly?
The simplest models of inflation involve a field that has some potential energy. During inflation, the field is slowly moving towards the minimum of that potential (it moves slowly because the rapid expansion during inflation acts as a sort of friction). Once it does reach the minimum, however, the field starts to oscillate about said minimum. These oscillations cause the field to decay into other particles, so that there is a transition from this large potential energy density and very low temperature to a radiation-dominated, high-temperature state. This process is known as reheating.

The subsequent radiation-dominated state tends to slow its expansion rather rapidly with time.
 
It's important to point out that inflation actually stops before reheating. Inflation only occurs for scalar fields that are potential energy dominated. As Chalnoth says, initially the field is at the top of a local maximum of its potential and is rolling slowly (potential energy dominated). It is perfectly OK to analogize with a ball rolling off a hill -- initially at rest and gravitational potential energy dominated. In such a case, the scalar field behaves like a cosmological constant and leads to accelerated expansion. However, as the field rolls of the maximum and picks up kinetic energy. Once this kinetic energy dominates over the potential, the field no longer gravitates like a cosmological constant and inflation ceases. Just before it begins its coherent oscillations, the scalar field gravitates more like a cosmic string network and is non-inflationary. As the oscillations set-in, it constitutes a Bose-Einstein condensate. Upon decay, the universe is reheated into hot radiation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K