Three large earthquakes in SW Pacific: Solomon Islands, Kermadec, Loyalty Islands

  • Thread starter Thread starter davenn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Seismology
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 4K views
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
9,747
Reaction score
11,967
Hi guys

the last 24 hours has seen 3 large quakes in the SW Pacific area

6.5 central Solomon Isl. not far from Kirakira
M 6.5 - 65km NW of Kirakira, Solomon Islands

6.9 southern Kermadec Isl. area
M 6.9 - 61km SW of L'Esperance Rock, New Zealand

6.3 Loyalty Isl area E of New Caledonia
M 6.3 - 202km WNW of Ile Hunter, New Caledonia

the recording from my seismo system
http://www.sydneystormcity.com/seismograms.htm

180909-10  UT M 6.5 Solomons, 6.9 Kermadecs, 6.3 Loyalty Isl zhi.gif
cheers
Dave
 
Attachments
  • 180909-10  UT M 6.5 Solomons, 6.9 Kermadecs, 6.3 Loyalty Isl zhi.gif
    180909-10 UT M 6.5 Solomons, 6.9 Kermadecs, 6.3 Loyalty Isl zhi.gif
    205.2 KB · Views: 1,206
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara, Charles Link, Wrichik Basu and 3 others
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
@davenn Just a point of clarification for us ignorant types, please. Suppose two unrelated seismic events are concurrent, i.e., overlapping in time. Using the seismic graph, how can you differentiate them?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
jim mcnamara said:
Suppose two unrelated seismic events are concurrent, i.e., overlapping in time. Using the seismic graph, how can you differentiate them?

OK this does happen from time to time, actually reasonably regularly.
Mainly with a large event with one or more aftershocks buried in the larger events' signal. I personally haven't been able to see,
say a, M5.5 aftershock that is buried in the M7.2 mainshock if they have occurred within a minute of each other.

here's a recent example ….
Main shock
M 8.2 - 286km NNE of Ndoi Island, Fiji
2018-08-19 00:19:40 (UTC)

Aftershock
M 6.3 - 268km NNE of Ndoi Island, Fiji
2018-08-19 00:23:06 (UTC)

On my recording, I couldn't tell that there were 2 events separated by ~ 4 minutes. But the experts could :smile:

upload_2018-9-12_13-18-4.png
How they do it, I am not sure. Maybe I need to send some emails and see if they will tell me. :biggrin:

Now for the same or closely times events that are separated by some distance, then it becomes easy to differentiate the events using a seismograph network.
as there will always be one or more sensors in the network that are closer to one of those 2 events that what the other sensors are.
It then just becomes a matter of the timing of the P wave arrivals at the various network sensors from which they can then produce locations for the events.hope that helps

Dave
 
Attachments
  • upload_2018-9-12_13-18-4.png
    upload_2018-9-12_13-18-4.png
    138.3 KB · Views: 1,100
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara and BillTre
OK with a bit of playing around with filtering. Mainly doing high pass filtering so I could cut out a large portion of the
lower frequency signals. This helps the P wave arrivals from both events to stand out clearer.
I did a 6 pole hi-pass filtered from 1Hz

P arrivals.JPG
 
Attachments
  • P arrivals.JPG
    P arrivals.JPG
    43.2 KB · Views: 1,077
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith, jim mcnamara and BillTre