What Causes Quantum Locking in Levitation Videos?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rshalloo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of quantum locking as observed in levitation videos featuring YBCO (Yttrium Barium Copper Oxide) superconductors. Participants explore the mechanisms behind the Meissner effect, the role of sapphire as a substrate, and the nature of superconductivity, debating whether these effects can be fully explained by classical physics or if they inherently involve quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes YBCO's behavior under the Meissner effect, suggesting it expels magnetic fields and becomes locked in place due to flux tubes, which are areas where superconductivity is lost.
  • Another participant clarifies that sapphire is a suitable substrate for YBCO due to lattice matching, and mentions that bulk YBCO can also achieve similar effects without a substrate.
  • There is a contention regarding the classification of superconductivity and the Meissner effect, with some arguing these are quantum phenomena while others suggest they can be explained through classical physics.
  • A later reply acknowledges the quantum nature of superconductivity but points out that some aspects can be described using semi-classical models like the 2-fluid model.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the phenomena associated with quantum locking can be fully explained by classical physics or if they fundamentally involve quantum mechanics. No consensus is reached regarding the nature of these effects.

Contextual Notes

Participants note conflicting reports about the role of sapphire versus YBCO in the formation of flux tubes, indicating a lack of clarity on this aspect. Additionally, the discussion highlights the complexity of solid-state physics, where many phenomena may require quantum mechanical explanations.

rshalloo
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I was just wondering if I have the right idea about what's going on in these quantum 'levitation' videos.

So the little discs that zoom around on the track are made up of YBCO film on a super thin sapphire disc. YBCO is a superconductor and so it experiences the Meissner effect, that is that it produces a current within the material to oppose the magnetic field thus essentially expelling it. While it experiences this it is important to remember that YBCO is a type two superconductor so it has thin quantums of flux passing through it (fluxoids). These are areas in which the YBCO has lost its superconducting ability and so its ability to expel a magnetic field. It's these flux tubes which cause the material to become locked in the magnetic field. Due to the Meissner effect the superconductor will create a current to counter the flux in the flux tubes. Once this has happened the material is essentially locked in place as any attempt to move it will result in an opposing force from the superconductor. It is this phenomenon which allows the YBCO to locked in any position i.e tilted, upside-down etc.

My question (aside from do I have the right idea of what's going on) is, what exactly is the role of the sapphire? Is it the sapphire or the YBCO that causes the flux tubes? I've read conflicting reports about which one causes it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sapphire just happens to be a good material to grow YBCO films on (you can also use STO, MgO,LAO, LSAT, MgO and many others), mainly because the YBCO crystal is lattice matched to sapphire.
You don't need to use YBCO grown on a substrate, a piece of bulk YBCO works just as well.

Also, there is nothing "quantum" about this, this is mostly just classical physics.
 
But surely the Meissner effect and especially superconductivity are quantum effects? There's no classical explanation for them?
 
rshalloo said:
But surely the Meissner effect and especially superconductivity are quantum effects? There's no classical explanation for them?

True, but then there is no classical explanation for most things in solid state physics; just about everything requires at least some QM.
The Meissner effect can be descrived reasonably well using the 2-fluid model, which is semi-classical.
 
Ah right, I see what you mean. Thanks very much :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
752
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
420