What causes the change in direction of the magnetic field in motional emf?

  • Thread starter Thread starter carlos125
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emf Motional emf
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the concept of motional electromotive force (emf) and the behavior of magnetic fields in different scenarios. When a conductor moves perpendicularly through a magnetic field, electrons experience a force defined by FB = qv x B, leading to charge separation within the conductor. The confusion arises when discussing the direction of the magnetic field in a closed-loop system, where Lenz's law indicates that the induced magnetic field opposes the external field, resulting in a field directed out of the page when the external field points into the page.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of motional electromotive force (emf)
  • Familiarity with Lenz's law
  • Knowledge of magnetic fields and forces (FB = qv x B)
  • Basic principles of electric circuits and induced current
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lenz's law in detail to understand induced magnetic fields
  • Explore the concept of magnetic flux and its role in closed-loop circuits
  • Learn about the applications of motional emf in real-world scenarios
  • Investigate the relationship between induced current and magnetic fields using Faraday's law
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for exams in electromagnetism, educators teaching physics concepts, and anyone interested in the practical applications of motional emf and magnetic fields.

carlos125
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Motional emf -easy question(re-edited)

Hi guys ,:

i'm learning about the motional emf , because i will have to take an exam soon, but I've found something really confusin for me well :
they say that when a conductor is moving in a direction perpendicular to the field with constant velocity under the influence of some external agent. The electrons in the conductor experience a force FB = qv x B that is directed along the length ℓ, perpendicular to both v and B . Under the influence of this force, the electrons move to the lower end of the conductor and accumulate there, leaving a net positive charge at the upper end. As a result of this charge separation, an electric field is produced inside the conductor.ok I understand all this (I'm talkin about the upper figure on the attachment)
Dibujo.JPG



Question(lower figure on the attachment):
BUT when the conductor slides along two conducting rails they say that there is a magnetic field that goes to the left , Why? I mean they just said that it goes downwards and they now say that it goes to the left? it's really confusing :confused:, it would be great if anyone can help me please ..By the way I'm sorry for my bad english
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have fixed the attachment problem
 


carlos125 said:
Hi guys ,:

Question(lower figure on the attachment):
BUT when the conductor slides along two conducting rails they say that there is a magnetic field that goes to the left , Why? I mean they just said that it goes downwards and they now say that it goes to the left? it's really confusing :confused:, it would be great if anyone can help me please ..By the way I'm sorry for my bad english

I don't think there is a magnetic field pointing to the left.

By Lenz' law, the generated field must oppose the external field. So the generated field must point out of the page (since the external field points into the page).

The induced current travels around the closed circuit with R in the path. Everywhere along the circuit you can imagine circular magnetic loops per Ampere's law.
 
In the diagram, FB is the restoring force
In example 1'the induced emf causes Charges to Move up (FE =qvxB)
To counter this, FB restores equilibrium by moving opposite charges to the bottom of the wire CreatIng a Potential difference

For diagram two, the current travels CCW in the system when Fapp is applied. However'this offsets the System
equilibrium as the FLUX through a closed loop has changed'
Therefore, there is an induced force on the rod FB to return the state to equallibrinm.The key differences in these examples is that the second is a closed loop that you are now having to deal with flux,
 
Thank you !
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
671
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K