What Causes the Error in Calculating the L2 Norm of Complex Functions?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of the L2 norm for complex functions and the confusion surrounding the inner product notation. The user attempts to demonstrate the equation \|f-jg\|^2 = \|f\|^2 - 2 \Im\{<f,g>\} but struggles with the implications of complex inner products. There is a debate about whether f and g are complex functions or just their real parts, leading to misunderstandings in deriving the norm. The user also questions the use of integrals versus inner product notation, highlighting the complexities of handling imaginary components in these calculations. Ultimately, the conversation reveals the need for clarity on inner product properties in complex vector spaces.
divB
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I want to show:

<br /> \|f-jg\|^2 = \|f\|^2 - 2 \Im\{&lt;f,g&gt;\} + \|g\|^2<br />

However, as far as I understand, for complex functions &lt;f,g&gt; = \int f g^* dt, right? Therefore:

<br /> \|f-jg\|^2 = &lt;f-jg, f-jg&gt; = \int (f-jg)(f-jg)^* dt = \int (f-jg)(f+jg) dt = \int f^2 + jfg - jfg + g^2 dt = \|f\|^2 + \|g\|^2<br />

Where is my wrong assumption?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are f and g complex functions? Then you should write f = Re(f) + j Im(f), g = Re(g) + j Im(g).

Or are they just the real parts of a single function? Because then you've just shown that ||f||² = ||Re f||² + ||Im f||², which makes sense, right?
 
divB said:
<br /> \int (f-jg)(f-jg)^* dt = \int (f-jg)(f+jg) dt<br />
This one should be $$\int (f-jg)(f-jg)^* dt = \int (f-jg)(f^*+jg^*) dt.$$ But why use the definition of <,> at all? I assume that you have already proved that it's an inner product. So why not just use that?
 
Hi, thank you. Ok, no integrals, but only use <,>

I am again confused :(

\|v\|^2 = &lt;v,v&gt;, as far as I understand also for complex functions. But then, with using only the inner product, I have no chance to obtain an imaginary part only:

<br /> \|f-jg\|^2 = &lt;f-jg,f-jg&gt; = &lt;f,f-jg&gt;-&lt;jg,f-jg&gt; \\<br /> = &lt;f,f&gt; - &lt;f,jg&gt; - (&lt;jg,f&gt;-&lt;jg,jg&gt;) \\<br /> = &lt;f,f&gt; - &lt;f,jg&gt; - &lt;jg,f&gt; + &lt;jg,jg&gt; \\<br /> = &lt;f,f&gt; - j&lt;f,g&gt; - j&lt;g,f&gt; - &lt;g,g&gt;<br /> = \|f\|^2 - 2j&lt;f,g&gt; - \|g\|^2<br />

But 2j&lt;f,g&gt; is not 2\Im&lt;f,g&gt;...
 
What is <cf, g> and what is <f, cg> if c is a complex number?
 
divB said:
&lt;f,f&gt; - &lt;f,jg&gt; - &lt;jg,f&gt; + &lt;jg,jg&gt; \\<br /> =&lt;f,f&gt; - j&lt;f,g&gt; - j&lt;g,f&gt; - &lt;g,g&gt;\\<br /> = \|f\|^2 - 2j&lt;f,g&gt; - \|g\|^2<br />
These steps are both wrong. What are the properties of an inner product on a complex vector space?
 
Last edited:
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K