What conditions must be met before star becomes a black hole?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the conditions required for a star to become a black hole, exploring the role of mass, the processes involved in stellar evolution, and the significance of iron in fusion reactions. Participants examine the transition from supernova to black hole formation, touching on various astrophysical concepts and mechanisms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that mass, rather than size, is the critical factor that determines whether a star will become a black hole.
  • It is suggested that massive stars evolve into supergiants and undergo supernova explosions, leading to the formation of either neutron stars or black holes based on their mass.
  • One participant questions the significance of iron in this process, suggesting that iron's stability affects fusion reactions and may play a role in the collapse of the star.
  • Another participant explains that once iron forms in the core, fusion reactions cease, leading to gravitational collapse and potentially resulting in a black hole if the mass is sufficient.
  • There is mention of the Schwarzschild radius, indicating that for a black hole to form, the core remnant must be within this critical size.
  • Some participants discuss the role of degeneracy pressure in the collapse of neutron stars and the transition to a black hole, introducing the concept of quark-gluon plasma as a possible state of matter in this scenario.
  • Details are provided about the sequence of fusion reactions in a red supergiant and the eventual collapse due to the lack of sustaining fusion processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that mass is a key factor in determining whether a star becomes a black hole, but there are multiple competing views on the processes involved and the significance of elements like iron. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of these processes and the nature of the final state of matter in a black hole.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on definitions of mass and size, as well as the unresolved details surrounding the transition from neutron stars to black holes and the exact nature of the core remnant.

Stu21
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
If only some stars become black holes what sets them apart from other stars, is it just size?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Stu21 said:
If only some stars become black holes what sets them apart from other stars, is it just size?
To be precise, rather than size, it is mass. Massive stars evolve to a supergiant star after it's main sequence. That's because of it's large mass, which ignites furthermore reactions and after the formation of iron, a supernova occurs. The leftover core may become a neutron star or a black hole, depending on it's mass.
 
Right, mass, should have been more specific, so giant stars at the end of their life go supernova, this is due to the fusion of Iron in the core sending out a massive shock wave. So what then is so special about Iron, I believe it was the cosmos series by Carl Sagan where I heard that all elements tend to want form Iron, that is they will gain or loose protons or undergo fission or fusion, to attain this state. So if black holes come from supernovas, then could the Iron be crushed to a single dense enough point to be considered a black hole, does Iron have the mass for this?
 
When a core of iron forms at the heart of the supergiant, and other elements required for fusion exhaust, no more reactions take place. (because iron is a stable element with respect to fusion or fission. The energy needed to trigger an iron fusion reaction is greater than that it gives out while fusing, thus consuming all heat and energy in the star). Now the gravity overpowers the radiation outburst (since there is no radiation outburst), and the star collapses greatly, crushing the core where the protons are fused into electrons, forming neutrons. Thus generated shock wave rips the outer layers apart, blowing the star off in a supernova. The remaining core is not of iron but neutrons which contract to form a neutron star. But, if the initial mass was even more greater (about 30 suns), the neutron star collapses further to form a black hole, a singularity in space.
 
Stu21 said:
If only some stars become black holes what sets them apart from other stars, is it just size?

Mass.

Size is not the determining factor. The sun will become a red giant yet it lacks the mass necessary to become a black hole. So it will wind up as a white dwarf instead.
 
Some additional details about your question:

The first collapse into a neutron star occurs because the electron degeneracy pressure can no longer withstand the gravitational force

If it collapses again, it is now because neutron degeneracy pressure can no longer
withstand the gravitational force

What you are left with in a black hole, after a neutron star collapses, is a quark-gluon plasma.

Typically, a Red Super Giant will burn through its hydrogen, helium, carbon, oxygen, neon, magnesium, and sillicon layers, in that order, and will then collapse because no fusion reactions are keeping it from doing so.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K