What Defines the Smallest Submodule of a Module Containing a Given Subset?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iamalexalright
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    module
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around proving that the submodule N generated by a subset S of a module M is the smallest submodule containing S. Specifically, N is defined as N = <> = {r₁v₁ + ... + rₙvₙ | rᵢ ∈ R, vᵢ ∈ S}. Participants emphasize the need to precisely formulate what constitutes the smallest submodule, drawing parallels to the definition of maximal ideals in ring theory. The conclusion is that if L is any submodule containing N, then L must either equal N or M, establishing N as the smallest submodule.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of module theory and submodules
  • Familiarity with the concept of generating sets in algebra
  • Knowledge of ideals and maximal ideals in ring theory
  • Basic proficiency in algebraic structures and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of submodules in module theory
  • Learn about generating sets and their significance in algebra
  • Explore the definition and implications of maximal ideals in ring theory
  • Investigate examples of submodules and their relationships within modules
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and educators focusing on abstract algebra, particularly those interested in module theory and its applications in ring theory.

iamalexalright
Messages
157
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let S = \{v_{},...,v_{n}\} be a subset of a module M. Prove that
N = &lt;&lt;S&gt;&gt; = \{r_{1}v_{1} + ... + r_{n}v_{n} | r_{i} \in R, v_{i} \in S\}
is the smallest submodule of M containing S. First you will need to formulate precisely what it means to be the smallest submodule of M containing S.



don't really know where to start formulating this. A small hint would be appreciated so I can get started
 
Physics news on Phys.org
iamalexalright said:

Homework Statement


Let S = \{v_{},...,v_{n}\} be a subset of a module M. Prove that
N = &lt;&lt;S&gt;&gt; = \{r_{1}v_{1} + ... + r_{n}v_{n} | r_{i} \in R, v_{i} \in S\}
is the smallest submodule of M containing S. First you will need to formulate precisely what it means to be the smallest submodule of M containing S.



don't really know where to start formulating this. A small hint would be appreciated so I can get started

Think of something like a maximal ideal. See how it is defined and I think that you will be able to see how something is defined as the smallest submodule containing S (or subject any constraint.)
 
I know I am looking for something similar but this is the first time I've seen maximal ideals.

So basically an ideal I in a ring R is a maximal ideal if I =/= R and if whenever J is an ideal satisfying I <= J <= R, then either J = I or J = R.

So given N = <<S>> and L <= M and N <= L and N is the smallest submodule, then L = N or L = M.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K