What Determines the Gradient of ln(ax) for Different Values of a?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JizzaDaMan
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The gradient of the function y = ln(ax) is consistently 1/x, regardless of the value of a, as ln(a) is a constant that does not affect the derivative. The curves for different values of a (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) are merely vertical shifts of one another, which explains why they have the same gradient despite appearing different. This vertical shift is represented by ln(a), confirming that the derivative remains unchanged. The discussion clarifies a common misunderstanding about calculating derivatives and emphasizes that dy/dx already represents the derivative. Understanding these concepts helps clarify the relationship between the function and its gradient.
JizzaDaMan
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
It's easy to show that \frac{dy}{dx} of y = ln(ax) where a \in ℝ, a > 0 is always \frac{1}{x} :

y = ln(ax)
y = ln(a) + ln(x)

ln(a) is constant so its derivative is 0, and the derivative of ln(x) is \frac{1}{x}.
Hence:

\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{1}{x}

Attached is an image of y=ln(ax) with a = 1,2,3,4,5. It also shows all of their derivatives to be the same (the curve at the top). But they are clearly different curves! There must be some point at which one has a larger gradient than the others?? What am I missing?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot from 2013-11-30 12:27:43.jpg
    Screenshot from 2013-11-30 12:27:43.jpg
    29.3 KB · Views: 656
Physics news on Phys.org
JizzaDaMan said:
But they are clearly different curves! There must be some point at which one has a larger gradient than the others?? What am I missing?
The curves are just shifted upwards/downwards with respect to each other. This is not easy to see in the graph (as their non-vertical "distance" is not constant), but it is right. And constant offsets do not show up in the derivative.
 
oh of course! :D I feel a bit stupid now :P I guess they're shifted up by ln(a) right?
 
That's right.
 
Also, you don't "take dy/dx" of some function. dy/dx already represents the derivative of y with respect to x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K