What Determines the r_0 Constant in Nuclear Radius Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mateomy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Nucleus
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
mateomy
Messages
305
Reaction score
0
I've been noticing that for expressions finding the nuclear radius there is a constant term [itex]r_0[/itex], that I can't seem to find an explanation for. The full term is
[tex]R=r_{0}A^{1/3}[/tex]
That the atomic radius is roughly the 3rd root of the number of nucleons. But where is the [itex]r_0[/itex] coming from? I'm using Cottingham and Wong as sources but both of them fail to mention it's derivation. Plus, they both give [itex]{slightly}[/itex] different values, without looking I think Wong assigns it a value of 1.7 fm and Cottingham 1.1 fm. Can anyone explain this to me?


Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is I think an expression found by experimental or at least phenomenological means. As there ##A## is the number of nucleons, you would have that ##r_0## is the size of a single nucleon (and has to be determined experimentally of course). It is needed in this expression formally to give the right dimension to ##R##.

Also notice that (something I think is interesting) if you compute the volume of the nucleus (interpreting really ##r_0## as the radius of the single nucleon), you will have that the total volume is ##A## times the volume of a nucleon, which is clearly consistent with what one would imagine.
 
TSny said:
the formula is determined from various experiments. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_size.

Looking in the Wikipedia article to the values given for the experimental sizes of neutron and proton, indeed ##r_0## is a constant determined empirically and seems to me a sort of mean value of the two.