Intensity, Radius (Calculations)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculations related to sound intensity and distance from a point source. The intensity of sound is inversely proportional to the square of the radius, represented by the equation I = K/r². When the intensity is halved, the listener must adjust their distance to maintain the same perceived loudness. Specifically, to counteract the halving of intensity, the listener must move closer by a factor of √2, resulting in a new distance of r/√2 from the source.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sound intensity and its relationship to distance
  • Familiarity with the equation I = K/r²
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations
  • Knowledge of inverse proportionality concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of sound intensity and propagation
  • Learn about inverse square laws in physics
  • Explore practical applications of sound intensity calculations
  • Investigate how environmental factors affect sound intensity
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, acoustics researchers, and anyone interested in understanding sound propagation and intensity calculations.

Gunman
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point source of sound emits energy equally in all directions at a constant rate and a person 8m from the source listens. After a while, the intensity of the source is halved. If the person wishes the sound to be seem as loud as before, how far should he be now?


Homework Equations


intensity is inversely proportional to radius(distance from the source)


The Attempt at a Solution


I = (K)/(r^2)
I*(r^2)=K
So i presumed that since K has to be constant, and I has been halved. The radius would be (2)^(1/2). So why isn't the answer (2^(1/2))r ? I can understand that the answer is not correct because it is not possible for the intensity to be the same when the radius has increased. So can someone point out to me which part I went wrong? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since they are inversely proportional the person needs to get closer by some factor. If it were simply

[tex]I \alpha \frac{K}{r}[/tex]

and the intensity dropped by a factor of two then that is the equivalent of saying that the person went twice as far away, so in the case of the intensity of source being independent then to keep the same sound the person would half to cancel it out by going r/2.

Now in the case of it being inversely proportional to the square of the radius, if the intensity decreases by a half, it could have happened because someone traveled 2^(1/2) away, so if it were actually the source that decreased by a half then the person can cancel that effect just as if they could have caused it by doing the opposite, and traveling 2^(1/2) closer (i.e. r/(2^1/2)).

If it helps to see the algebra in addition to the qualitative observations here is how it would go for the two:
[tex]I \alpha \frac{1}{2} \frac{K}{r/2} = \frac{k}{r}[/tex]

[tex]I \alpha \frac{1}{2} \frac{K}{(r/\sqrt{2})^2} = \frac{k}{r^2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K