What Determines the Rate of a Chemical Reaction in Multi-Step Mechanisms?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aprilrenee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws Rate
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the rate of the chemical reaction S2O82- + 3 I-1 -> 2 SO42- + I3-1, which is first order in both reactants. The proposed mechanism includes four steps, with the first step identified as the rate-determining step due to the repulsive forces between negatively charged ions. The mechanism is confirmed to be stoichiometrically equal to the overall equation, as each step maintains a 1:1 ratio of reactants to products. The third step is expected to be the fastest due to the attraction between opposite charges, facilitating a quicker reaction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chemical kinetics and reaction order
  • Familiarity with multi-step reaction mechanisms
  • Knowledge of stoichiometry and balancing chemical equations
  • Basic concepts of electrostatic forces in chemistry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of rate-determining steps in chemical kinetics
  • Learn about the role of electrostatic forces in reaction mechanisms
  • Explore the methods for determining reaction order experimentally
  • Investigate the implications of multi-step mechanisms on overall reaction rates
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals interested in understanding reaction kinetics and mechanisms, particularly in the context of multi-step reactions.

aprilrenee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The reaction S2O82- + 3 I-1 -> 2 SO42- + I3-1 is first order in both reactants. The following mechanism is proposed:

I-1 + S2O82- -> IS2O83-
IS2O83- -> 2 SO42- + I+
I+ + I-1 -> I2
I2 +I-1 -> I3-1

a) Which step is the rate determining step?
b) Show that this mechanism is stoichiometrically equal to the overall equation.
c) Why would you expect the slow step in part (a) to be the slow step?
d) Why would you expect the third step to be the fastest step?


Homework Equations



1) How do I determine if a step is slow or fast?
2) In part (b), when it asks to show that the mechanism is stoichiometrically equal to the overall equation, does that mean adding up the steps? If so, I don't get it because wouldn't I then just add up all the other steps anyway? Or, do I balance the equation to make it look like the overall equation?

The Attempt at a Solution



Correct me if I'm wrong, but is the rate for this reaction:
Rate = k[S2O82-][I-1]

Other than that, I've been trying to google and YouTube many things to assist me.. I've received no luck. Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1)If you look at each of the steps, consider the attractive and repulsive forces acting on reactants and products. (This isn't the whole picture, but it's a significant part of it--the more ions/molecules are involved in a given step, the longer you have to wait for them to randomly come together just the right way to react.)

In the first step, you have to bring together two negatively charged ions which repel one another.
In the second step, the ion separates into two (-2) ions and one (+1) ion. If the positive ion is exactly in the middle between the other two, the repusive and attractive electrostatic forces will cancel out--but even the slightest deviation from that configuration will result in net repulsive forces which prevent the product ions fom lingering close to one another or recombining.
The third step has two opposite charges pulling towards one another before they combine.
The last step has a negative ion combining with a neutral molecule.

2) If you notice, each step that requires more than one reactant combines reactants in a 1:1 ratio, and each reactant that was a product of a previous step was produced in a 1:1 ratio with the reactants of that step, so there's no balancing to be done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K