What Determines the Void Space in Cubic Crystalline Structures?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reshma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crystal Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the maximum radius of interstitial spheres that can fit into the void spaces of cubic crystalline structures: simple cubic, body-centered cubic (BCC), and face-centered cubic (FCC). The relationships between the lattice constant 'a' and atomic radius 'r' are defined as follows: for simple cubic, r = a/2; for BCC, r = a√3/4; and for FCC, r = a√2/4. The position of the void space is determined geometrically by analyzing lattice planes and using the Pythagorean theorem to assess body and face diagonals. Understanding octahedral and tetrahedral voids is also recommended for further insight.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cubic crystalline structures
  • Familiarity with the hard sphere model
  • Knowledge of lattice constants and atomic radii
  • Basic geometry, particularly the Pythagorean theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the geometric analysis of octahedral and tetrahedral voids in crystalline structures
  • Explore the implications of the hard sphere model in material science
  • Study the relationship between lattice constants and atomic radii in different crystal systems
  • Investigate the practical applications of interstitial atoms in alloy formation
USEFUL FOR

Materials scientists, crystallographers, and students studying solid-state chemistry or physics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the geometric properties of crystalline structures and their implications for material properties.

Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
The problem here is to find the maximum radius of the interstitial sphere that could just fit into the void space of cubic crystalline structures of:
the simple cube
body centered cubic
face centered cubic

My question is how is position of the void space determined in these structures?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the hard sphere model ie. there are spheres of radius r at the lattice points and their radius and the lattice constant are connected via a relation for each of the unit cells.
 
inha said:
Use the hard sphere model ie. there are spheres of radius r at the lattice points and their radius and the lattice constant are connected via a relation for each of the unit cells.
Thank you for replying.
I'm aware of relationship between the lattice constant and the atomic radius.
Let 'a' be the lattice constant and 'r' be the atomic radius 'r'.
For simple cubic structure: r = \frac{a}{2}

For body centered:r = a\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}

For face centered: r = a\frac{\sqrt{2}}{4}

But how is the position of the void determined exactly(using geometry)?
 
Last edited:
Pick a lattice plane and draw the spheres for visual aid. It shouldn't be difficult to see where you can fit an interstitial atom. Then draw another sphere of unknown radius r' and solve for it in the same manner the a-r relations are normally solved.
 
In simple cubic's case, it is quite simple.

For BCC: Consider the body diagonal. It's length is aXsqrt3 (Pythagorus Theorem!).

For FCC: Consider the face diagonal. It's length is aXsqrt2 (Pythagorus again!).
 
And now: what about diamond bonding angle?
 
Uh, what about it?
 
Reshma said:
My question is how is position of the void space determined in these structures?
By intuition ?

I can't think of any simple scheme that will tell you where the largest interstitials are...but if you spend a little time (or a lot, depending on how familiar you are with crystal geometries) picturing the structure, you can easily guess where these positions are. For the SC, it's pretty obvious where the biggest void is. This gets a little harder for the BCC and the FCC, but in both cases, a little clever thinking will get you home.

If not, have you come across octahedral and tetrahedral voids ? You might want to give these a look...
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K