What did I do wrong in this Bessel equation?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
I need to convert[tex]x^{2}y''+2xy'+[kx^{2}-n(n+1)]y=0[/tex] using [tex]y=x^{-\frac{1}{2}}w[/tex] to a normal Modified Bessel Equation and I cannot get to that. I check many times and I must be having a blind spot!

This is my work:

[tex]y=x^{-\frac{1}{2}} w \Rightarrow y'=-\frac{1}{2}x^{-\frac{3}{2}}w+x^{-\frac{1}{2}}w' \Rightarrow y''=\frac{3}{4}x^{-\frac{5}{2}}w-\frac{1}{2}x^{-\frac{3}{2}}w'+x^{-\frac{1}{2}}w''-\frac{1}{2}x^{-\frac{3}{2}}w'[/tex]

[tex]x^{2}y''+2xy'+(kx^{2}-n(n+1))y=0 \Rightarrow[/tex]

[tex][\frac{3}{4}x^{-\frac{1}{2}}w-\frac{1}{2}x^{\frac{1}{2}}w'+x^{\frac{3}{2}}w''-\frac{1}{2}x^{\frac{1}{2}}w']+[2x^{\frac{1}{2}}w'-x^{-\frac{1}{2}}w]+[kx^{\frac{3}{2}}w-n(n+1)x^{-\frac{1}{2}})w]=0[/tex]


Grouping w'', w' and w terms:

[tex]x^{\frac{3}{2}}w''+(-x^{\frac{1}{2}}+2x^{\frac{1}{2}})w'+(\frac{3}{4}x^{-\frac{1}{2}}-x^{-\frac{1}{2}}+kx^{\frac{3}{2}}-n(n+1)x^{-\frac{1}{2}})w=0[/tex]

Multiply by [tex]x^{\frac{1}{2}}[/tex] This give:

[tex]x^{2}w''+xw'+(\frac{3}{4}-1+kx^{2}-n(n+1))w=0[/tex]

I can't get the standard Modified Bessel equation because the 3/4-1 in the w term cannot be cancel out.
Please tell me what I did wrong.

Thanks
Alan
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your arithmetic is correct (except that in the first line you have an exponent [tex]-\frac23[/tex] that should be [tex]-\frac32[/tex], but later steps are correct).

Is there any reason why the [tex]n[/tex] (order) in the equation you end up with is required to be the same you began with? I notice that your problematic constant term is [tex]-n^2 - n - \frac14[/tex], which factors nicely.
 
ystael said:
Your arithmetic is correct (except that in the first line you have an exponent [tex]-\frac23[/tex] that should be [tex]-\frac32[/tex], but later steps are correct).

Is there any reason why the [tex]n[/tex] (order) in the equation you end up with is required to be the same you began with? I notice that your problematic constant term is [tex]-n^2 - n - \frac14[/tex], which factors nicely.

You are right, I was blind! The final equation is with [tex](n+\frac{1}{2})^{2}[/tex]!

It must be old age! I read the final equation wrong and I just kept concentrate on what I did and never look at the final equation! Wasted almost an hour on this! The only excuse I can come up is I am 56! Too old!:rolleyes: BUT I am not old enough to conceed to you guys yet!

Thanks a million.

Alan
 
Last edited: