Cyrus
- 3,237
- 17
Mental Gridlock said:Well when none of my facts were refuted, I got to interject something else so maybe you can tackle that..
None of your facts were refuted because you took known facts and then drew your own bogus conclusion. We've already been though this once already.
You know the fact about the prison camps having no reasonable explanation just stands there. I speculate what the reason for those prison camps might be but I'm just a crackpot conspiracy theorist. Yet no OTHER theory exists for why the government is building those detention centers.. So yeah when the topic isn't being talked about..
I never said they have no reasonable explanation. YOU did. It doesn't stand anywhere. It is exactly your specualtion that makes your theory a crackpot one at best.
The topic is that our taxpayer dollars are being spent on building these detention centers. I'd like to know why our dollars are being spent as such.
I suggest you write to your congressman.
As you're unable to answer this other than to refer me to the DHS, (the DHS stated by the way their reason was "new programs", I already checked with them).. And nobody can tell me what those new programs might be.
Then why do you want me to tell you? Didnt you comprehend that I don't work at the DHS and that I can't speak for them?
So I speculate on the new programs and I'm a conspiracy theorist. Got it. Even though no one ever came forward with a reasonable conclusion yet.
Yes, you are.
You can't have an alternate theory without an official theory yet in place.
At least with the 9/11 conspiracy theory, there still is the official government explanation for how it happened. Yet regarding these "new programs" for these detention centers.
What else can we do other than guess why our government is spending our tax money on them? Considering the government hasn't yet told us their true purpose.
Again, write to your congressman.