mmmchicken
- 9
- 0
I.e. x,y,z
The discussion centers around the concept of dimensions that are not based on traditional geometric interpretations such as length, width, and depth. Participants explore various dimensions from both mathematical and physical perspectives, considering their implications and definitions.
Participants express varying interpretations of what constitutes a dimension outside of geometric constraints. There is no consensus on a definitive list of non-geometric dimensions, and the discussion remains open-ended with multiple viewpoints presented.
Some contributions rely on specific definitions of dimensions, which may not be universally accepted. The discussion includes a mix of mathematical, physical, and philosophical interpretations that may not align.
energy, mass, charge ?mmmchicken said:I.e. x,y,z
Funny. I thought OP was talking about dimensions in a mathematical sense.mathman said:energy, mass, charge ?
mmmchicken said:Is there a dimensions that doesn't have to do with length width or depth. Or shape at all