What Direction Should You Row to Cross a River Straight Across?

  • Thread starter Thread starter negation
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    River
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves rowing straight across a river that is 63 meters wide, where the rower can row at a speed of 1.3 m/s relative to the water, while the river flows at 5.7 m/s. Participants are discussing the direction in which the rower should head to cross the river directly and the time it will take to do so.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the rowing speed and the river's current, questioning whether it is possible to row straight across without being swept downstream. There are discussions about angles, with some suggesting 26° and others 116° from the x-axis, while also considering the implications of these angles in terms of direction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants expressing confusion over the correct angle to row and the time it would take to cross the river. Some have provided insights into the relationship between the rowing speed and the river current, while others have pointed out potential typos in the original problem statement that may affect the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of a potential typo regarding the river's speed, which is suggested to be 0.57 m/s instead of 5.7 m/s. Participants are also debating the reference points for measuring angles, as the original problem does not specify axes or compass directions.

negation
Messages
817
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You wish to row straight across a 63m wide river. You can row at a steady 1.3 m/s relative to the water, and the river flows at 5.7 m/s. In what direction should you head? How long will it take you to cross the river?

The Attempt at a Solution



Capture.JPG


Is the answer right? Could the answer equally be 26°?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about this with simple logic for a minute. The river is flowing downstream at some speed. In order to not be at all swept downstream, the upstream component of your rowing speed relative to the river has to exactly match the downstream speed of the river. Is that possible in this problem?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
phinds said:
Think about this with simple logic for a minute. The river is flowing downstream at some speed. In order to not be at all swept downstream, the upstream component of your rowing speed relative to the river has to exactly match the downstream speed of the river. Is that possible in this problem?

I suppose the answer is 116° instead of 64°.
 
negation said:
I suppose the answer is 116° instead of 64°.

Are you going to answer my question or just continue to ignore it?
 
phinds said:
Are you going to answer my question or just continue to ignore it?

I've already answered it. In rowing at 116° from the x-axis, the boat goes against the current, no?
 
I tried solving it from another approach, where;

(1.3ms^-1)^2 = (0.57ms^-1)^2 +y^2
y = 1.168ms^-1
theta = 26°
 
You need to reread my question in post #2. You have not answered it.
 
phinds said:
Think about this with simple logic for a minute. The river is flowing downstream at some speed. In order to not be at all swept downstream, the upstream component of your rowing speed relative to the river has to exactly match the downstream speed of the river. Is that possible in this problem?
There's a typo in the OP. If you look at the attachment you'll see the river speed is given as 0.57 m/s.
Yes, negation, the answer is 26 degrees to the normal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
haruspex said:
There's a typo in the OP. If you look at the attachment you'll see the river speed is given as 0.57 m/s.
Yes, negation, the answer is 26 degrees to the normal.

Ah ... well that explains it.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
There's a typo in the OP. If you look at the attachment you'll see the river speed is given as 0.57 m/s.
Yes, negation, the answer is 26 degrees to the normal.


My mistake for the typo. I apologize.
Would that be the same as 116 degrees from the x-axis since it would in other words implies 26 degrees NW.

Edit: I think it is.
 
  • #11
phinds said:
Think about this with simple logic for a minute. The river is flowing downstream at some speed. In order to not be at all swept downstream, the upstream component of your rowing speed relative to the river has to exactly match the downstream speed of the river. Is that possible in this problem?


It's not possible since
v_downwards> v_upwards.
I made a typo in the values.
 
  • #12
negation said:
My mistake for the typo. I apologize.
Would that be the same as 116 degrees from the x-axis since it would in other words implies 26 degrees NW.

Since the OP says nothing about x or y axes, nor about compass directions, that's impossible to answer.
In terms of river bank and direction of flow of river, where were you measuring 116 degrees from?
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
Since the OP says nothing about x or y axes, nor about compass directions, that's impossible to answer.
In terms of river bank and direction of flow of river, where were you measuring 116 degrees from?

I measured 116° from the x-axis.
That would put the boat in quadrant 2 but of course since there was no reference point mentioned by the question, it could equally be implied 26° NW, 64° from the x-axis or 26° NE, isn't it?
I have a preference for 116° from the x-axis to do away with all the bearings.
 
  • #14
negation said:
I measured 116° from the x-axis.
That would put the boat in quadrant 2 but of course since there was no reference point mentioned by the question, it could equally be implied 26° NW, 64° from the x-axis or 26° NE, isn't it?
I have a preference for 116° from the x-axis to do away with all the bearings.
I cannot see inside your head. I do not know where your x-axis is, nor which way the river runs in terms of a compass bearing.
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
I cannot see inside your head. I do not know where your x-axis is, nor which way the river runs in terms of a compass bearing.

Untitled.jpg


There.
 
  • #16
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #17
How long will it take?
t=d/v
t=63/1.3=48.5 s
is it correct?
i am comfused since the answer in my textbook tells that t=53.9 s.
please, provide me with explanation.
Regards.
 
  • #18
Mahmood Abd said:
How long will it take?
t=d/v
t=63/1.3=48.5 s
is it correct?
i am comfused since the answer in my textbook tells that t=53.9 s.
please, provide me with explanation.
Regards.
The 1.3m/s is the rowing speed relative to the water. It would take 48.5 s if you were to head straight across, relative to the water. But then you would end up somewhat downstream when you landed. In order to row straight across relative to the riverbank, you have to aim a little upstream. That means some of your 1.3m/s is spent countering the flow of the water.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K