A What Do Planck 2015 Results Reveal About Power Law Potential Models?

AI Thread Summary
The Planck 2015 results indicate that power law potential models are evaluated based on the values of the B-mode tensor perturbations, which are crucial for understanding inflation. The values of ln B for cubic and quartic potentials are considered "strongly disfavored," while the quadratic potential's value is "moderately disfavored," raising questions about the thresholds that define these categorizations. Different inflationary potential shapes lead to varying relationships between tensor and scalar perturbations, with scalar perturbations affecting temperature variations and tensor perturbations influencing CMB polarization. The B-mode spectrum serves as a nearly direct measurement of tensor perturbations from inflation, yet current observations suggest these perturbations are too small to detect. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities in interpreting inflationary models and their implications for cosmology.
JD_PM
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
156
TL;DR Summary
I am trying to understand why the simple inflationary model with potential ##V(\phi) \propto \phi^2## is disfavored compared to models predicting a smaller tensor-to-scalar ratio.
I am reading Planck 2015 results. In particular, I focused on "Power law potentials" subsection.

The issues I have are

1. I do not understand why the validity of the model can be determined by the value of the ##B## mode.
2. Why the ##B## mode values ##\ln B = −11.6## and ##\ln B = −23.3## for the cubic and quartic potentials , respectively, are regarded as "strongly disfavored" and ##\ln B = −4.7## for the quadratic potential as "moderately disfavored"? What I mean is: what is the threshold value at which we can consider the potential as favored and why?

Thank you! :biggrin:
 
Space news on Phys.org
Different inflationary potential shapes predict different relationships between the tensor perturbations and scalar perturbations. The scalar perturbations contribute primarily to the temperature variations across the sky. The tensor perturbations contribute primarily to the polarization of the observed CMB.

The observed E-mode spectrum is dominated by effects after inflation such as structure formation, so it isn't a very good measure of the tensor perturbations.

The large-scale B-mode spectrum is mostly independent of late-time effects, so it's a nearly direct measurement of the tensor perturbations produced during inflation. So far all we've been able to say is that the magnitude of these perturbations is too small to be detected (yet).

Quadratic potentials for inflation typically predict that we would have detected the tensor perturbations by now. This is shown in Fig. 12 in that paper.
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Back
Top