What do the notations in functional analysis mean for a given function?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding specific notations in functional analysis related to a function ##f:G\to \mathbb R##. Participants seek clarification on the meanings of various function spaces, including ##C(G), C(\bar G), L_2(G), W_2^1(G),## and ##\dot W_1^2(G)##, with a focus on the implications of these notations for the properties of the function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that ##C(G)## indicates that ##f## is continuous on ##G## and that ##C(\bar G)## implies continuity on the closure ##\bar G##.
  • Another participant agrees with the interpretations of the ##C## and ##L## notations but expresses uncertainty about the ##W## notation.
  • A different participant provides a definition of ##W_{2,k}(a,b)## as functions that are ##k-1## times continuously differentiable, with specific conditions on the derivatives, and notes that ##W_{2,s}(\mathbb{R}^m)## refers to Sobolev spaces.
  • This participant also cautions against using the ##W## terms without proper definitions.
  • A later reply indicates that one participant found a definition related to generalized derivatives.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the interpretations of the ##C## and ##L## notations, but there is uncertainty and lack of consensus regarding the ##W## notation and its implications.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the need for definitions when using specific notations in functional analysis, particularly for the ##W## spaces, which may vary in meaning depending on the context.

member 428835
Hi PF!

Can someone help me understand the notation here (I've looked everywhere but can't find it): given a function ##f:G\to \mathbb R## I'd like to know what ##C(G),C(\bar G),L_2(G),W_2^1(G),\dot W_1^2(G)##. I think ##C(G)## implies ##f## is continuous on ##G## and that ##C(\bar G)## implies ##f## is continuous on ##\bar G##. ##L_2(G)## implies ##F## is square-integrable on ##G##, but I'm not sure of ##W_2^1(G),\dot W_2^1(G)##.

Any help would be awesome!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
joshmccraney said:
Hi PF!

Can someone help me understand the notation here (I've looked everywhere but can't find it): given a function ##f:G\to \mathbb R## I'd like to know what ##C(G),C(\bar G),L_2(G),W_2^1(G),\dot W_1^2(G)##. I think ##C(G)## implies ##f## is continuous on ##G## and that ##C(\bar G)## implies ##f## is continuous on ##\bar G##. ##L_2(G)## implies ##F## is square-integrable on ##G##, but I'm not sure of ##W_2^1(G),\dot W_2^1(G)##.

Any help would be awesome!

I think you are right about the C and the L notations, although it is hard to say without context. I have never seen the W notation though...
 
I have a book in which ##W_{2,k}(a,b)## is defined as all (complex valued) functions on ##[a,b]## which are ##k-1## fold continuously differentiable, where the ##k-1## derivative is absolutely continuous and the ##k-##th derivative is in ##L_2(a,b)## with
$$
\langle f,g\rangle_k = \sum_{j=0}^k \int_a^b f^{(j)}(x)^*g^{(j)}(x)\,dx
$$
##W_{2,s}(\mathbb{R}^m)## is defined as the Sobolev space of order ##s## in the book. Tao also uses ##W## for Sobolev spaces.

But I don't think one can just use those terms without definition.
 
Last edited:
Thank you both! I found a definition through generalized derivatives.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K