What do you think of The Universe series?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kikko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion critiques "The Universe" series for its oversimplification and reliance on interviews over animation, with participants expressing disappointment in its educational value compared to college-level astronomy courses. Users note that many space documentaries, including those featuring Michio Kaku, blend factual physics with misleading information, prioritizing entertainment over accuracy. The consensus highlights a general dissatisfaction with the quality of scientific content in popular media, emphasizing that these programs often cater to a scientifically uninformed audience.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic astronomy concepts
  • Familiarity with popular science documentaries
  • Knowledge of media literacy principles
  • Awareness of the role of advertising in media content
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Hawking's Into the Universe" for comparative analysis
  • Explore the accuracy of scientific claims in documentaries
  • Investigate the impact of media on public understanding of science
  • Learn about the principles of effective science communication
USEFUL FOR

Anyone interested in the intersection of science and media, including educators, science communicators, and viewers seeking to critically evaluate the content of popular science documentaries.

kikko
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I've seen a bit and thought it was overly simplified, and disappointed with there being so many interviews and little animation. I think I learned just as much through my intro astronomy class in college. I'm wondering if Hawking's Into the Universe is much better. I actually don't know much about informative space documentaries besides Cosmos and The Planets.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
kikko said:
I've seen a bit and thought it was overly simplified, and disappointed with there being so many interviews and little animation. I think I learned just as much through my intro astronomy class in college. I'm wondering if Hawking's Into the Universe is much better.

NONE of the TV programs contain totally factual information as far as I've seen. They all mix in real physics with a large amount of just nonsense and outright false statements. There have been several threads on this forum bemoaning that fact.

They are mass media popularizations, so we really should not expect otherwise. They are NOT in business to tell the truth but to sell ads.
 
The worst are the ones w/ Micchio Kaku. I appreciate him being one of the best theoretical physicists but all he does is preach about how cool the future will be. The worst part of it is all of the technology he talks about is so beyond hypothetical, that it isn't even known if what he is suggesting is possible to do in the first place. But he gets away from it by always saying "In the distant future, we will be able to do "X" ".

I get the audience he is going for is probably the scientific illiterate, but when the all-elusive science television series are put on broadcast, I just expect more.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K