What is the Voltage Reading in this Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JustinLevy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Voltmeter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of voltage readings in circuits, particularly when involving inductors and changing magnetic fields. It establishes that a voltmeter measures the work done to move a test charge along a path, represented by the equation Voltmeter = -∫_a^b E · dl, rather than simply the scalar potential difference V(b) - V(a). The confusion arises in scenarios involving inductance, where the voltage across an inductor is defined as Voltage = L dI/dt, highlighting the importance of gauge invariance in electrical measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic circuit theory and components
  • Familiarity with inductors and their behavior in circuits
  • Knowledge of electromotive force (EMF) and Faraday's law of induction
  • Proficiency in vector calculus, particularly line integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Faraday's Law of Induction and its applications in circuit analysis
  • Learn about gauge invariance in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the concept of inductance and its role in AC circuits
  • Investigate the relationship between magnetic fields and electric fields in dynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in circuit design or analysis, particularly those working with inductors and dynamic electrical systems.

JustinLevy
Messages
882
Reaction score
1
When working out circuits problems, can we consider a voltmeter to read the difference in the scalar potential between two points
Voltmeter = V(b) - V(a),
or does it tell us a "path potential" / work to move a test charge along a path
Voltmeter = -\int_a^b \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{l}
?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the difference?
 
In general, the potentials are defined as such:
\mathbf{E} = - \nabla V - \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \mathbf{A}
\mathbf{B} = \nabla \times \mathbf{A}
That doesn't define them uniquely, but at least up to a gauge transformation.

In cases where an eletric field is being generated by a changing magnetic field (such as in an inductor), then those two suggestions in the openning post will differ. Therefore this is relevant for asking what a voltmeter would read across an inductor.
 
I just realized that the answer cannot be V(b)-V(a), because then the measurements would not be gauge invariant. So the answer must be the E.dl one.

Is that correct?
 
That simple post has got me so confused now.

Consider this:
15i7zab.gif

Let's say that this loop has inductance L, no resistance, and that initially there is no current in the loop. Then at time t=0, a current source is used to increase the current at a steady rate (I = a t).

Current goes up the green wire, around the blue loop, and then up the red wire. Additionally, consider a voltmeter connected with the ground on the red point, and the "positive" terminal on the green point.

What does the volt meter read?

Well, when the current starts increasing, a magnetic field will be generated in the positive direction. It appears that this increase in flux will cause an eletric field around the loop against the current, which would mean the integral of - E.dl from the red to the green point is negative.

This seems to argue the voltmeter would read Voltage = - L dI/dt.


This is clearly wrong, as we should get:
Voltage = L dI/dt

What the heck is going on here?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
19K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K