What does 'fold' mean in terms of increasing by 10?

  • Thread starter Thread starter endfx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
AI Thread Summary
The term "ten-fold" refers to an increase that is ten times the original amount. It does not imply raising the amount to the power of ten, which would be a much larger figure. The expression is straightforward and simply means multiplying the original value by ten. This usage is rooted in older expressions and is commonly understood in various contexts. Overall, "ten-fold" clearly indicates a ten times increase.
endfx
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
When Someone says, "It increased by 10 fold", what does that mean?
10 times the original amount, or amount^10 or something like that?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's an old expression, but it just means "times." Something increasing ten-fold means it's ten times what it used to be.

- Warren
 
Also occurs in "manifold", just FYI. :smile:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top