What Does It Mean for a Function to Have Compact Support?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A function f: R -> R is said to have compact support if it is non-zero only on a closed subset of R, specifically within a finite closed interval. This means that f must vanish at both positive and negative infinity. The Gaussian function, while never zero, does not have compact support as it does not meet this criterion. The key takeaway is that compact support implies the function is zero outside a finite interval, clarifying the distinction between vanishing at infinity and being zero on a closed subset.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real-valued functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of support in mathematical analysis
  • Knowledge of compact sets in topology
  • Basic understanding of limits and behavior of functions at infinity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of compact sets in topology
  • Learn about the concept of support in functional analysis
  • Explore examples of functions with compact support, such as piecewise functions
  • Investigate the behavior of the Gaussian function and its implications in analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of functions and their behavior at infinity.

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,
given a function f:R->R, can anyone explain what is meant when we say that "f has compact support"?

Some sources seem to suggest that it means that f is non-zero only on a closed subset of R.
Other sources say that f vanishes at infinity. This definition seem to contradict the previous: for example the Gaussian is never 0 but does vanish at infinity.

So, where is the misunderstanding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Compact support means the function is zero everywhere outside some finite interval. Gaussian does not have compact support.
 
Last edited:
It naturally means that the support of the function is a compact set, or equivalently as mathman points out; contained in a finite closed interval. This implies that f must vanish at positive and negative infinity, but is not equivalent as your example shows.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K