What Does it Mean When a Black Hole is Spinning?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of angular momentum in black holes, specifically "rotating black holes." Angular momentum is derived from the original body that formed the black hole and can change as the black hole absorbs material. The phenomenon of Frame Dragging is crucial for understanding how angular momentum affects the surrounding spacetime. The conversation highlights the distinction between the black hole's properties and the effects observed from an external perspective.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum in astrophysics
  • Familiarity with black hole formation and characteristics
  • Knowledge of general relativity and its implications
  • Concept of Frame Dragging in spacetime
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Kerr solution in general relativity for rotating black holes
  • Explore the concept of Frame Dragging and its mathematical implications
  • Study the Schwarzschild radius and its significance in black hole physics
  • Investigate the relationship between angular momentum and spacetime geometry
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of astrophysics seeking to deepen their understanding of black hole dynamics and the implications of angular momentum in general relativity.

Gonzalo Chumillas
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The angular momentum is related to the rotation. And when a black hole has angular momentum, it is said that it is a "rotating black hole". But what does it mean? A black hole does not have a conventional surface, like a basketball. How should we interpret that angular momentum?

I asked this question previously in a Spanish forum, but nobody know :( And I think it is a very simple question.

Thank you and sorry for my basic English.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gonzalo Chumillas said:
The angular momentum is related to the rotation. And when a black hole has angular momentum, it is said that it is a "rotating black hole". But what does it mean? A black hole does not have a conventional surface, like a basketball. How should we interpret that angular momentum?

I asked this question previously in a Spanish forum, but nobody know :( And I think it is a very simple question.

Thank you and sorry for my basic English.
The angular momentum of the black hole is simply the angular momentum of the body that it formed from. It is detectable via the phenomenon of Frame Dragging.

Point of order: If I can answer it, it isn't advanced ;)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gonzalo Chumillas
m4r35n357 said:
The angular momentum of the black hole is simply the angular momentum of the body that it formed from. It is detectable via the phenomenon of Frame Dragging.

Point of order: If I can answer it, it isn't advanced ;)
Of course, it can change as it engulfs infalling material.
 
m4r35n357 said:
The angular momentum of the black hole is simply the angular momentum of the body that it formed from. It is detectable via the phenomenon of Frame Dragging.

Point of order: If I can answer it, it isn't advanced ;)

Thanks. It seems to be advanced for Spanish forums, since nobody know :D
 
Gonzalo Chumillas said:
The angular momentum is related to the rotation. And when a black hole has angular momentum, it is said that it is a "rotating black hole". But what does it mean? A black hole does not have a conventional surface, like a basketball. How should we interpret that angular momentum?

I asked this question previously in a Spanish forum, but nobody know :( And I think it is a very simple question.

Thank you and sorry for my basic English.
That's a good question, and personally I don't know if we can relate the angular momentum or "spinning" of a black hole with the casual meaning of rotating or spinning.

From a quantitative perspective one applies the conservation laws to determine that the angular momentum of a black hole plus that carried by any material blasted away at the formation is equal to the angular momentum of the star that collapsed. Then later any type of matter or energy with angular momentum that is absorbed or emitted by the black hole will add or remove angular momentum from it. But is it (the singularity?) rotating in the usual everyday meaning of the word? No idea, the question itself might be meaningless.
 
Maybe, the angular momentum can be understood as a distortion in the adjacent space-time around the black hole, not the black hole itself. That is: the angular momentum is a property of the adjacent space-time around a black hole. But I have no idea, actually :D
 
Gonzalo Chumillas said:
A black hole does not have a conventional surface, like a basketball.
From the perspective of an outer observer all the material that builds the black hole is stuck on the horizon because of the infinite time dilation at its surface. This material is, from that perspectice, frozen right above the horizon, but angular momentum has to be conserved so it becomes space itself that rotates (with time standing still on the surface). Because there is, still speaking from the outer perspective, nothing inside black holes (not even spacetime, see the Schwarzschild paraboloid, which has a hole in the middle where the Schwarzschildradius begins), what you get is a rotating shell. For the infalling particle the story is a bit different, but as long as we are talking about the black hole from the outside.
 
There is an interpretation of spin in Einstein-Cartan theory. In this theory, the spacetime has an additional property of torsion. Not only curvature, but also torsion. The torsion is coupled to the curvature and this is known as frame-dragging.

Rotating black hole (or in some interpretations even elementary particles) has nonzero torsion.
 
haael said:
The torsion is coupled to the curvature and this is known as frame-dragging.

I don't think this is correct. Frame dragging is an effect that appears in standard GR, where the connection is torsion-free.

haael said:
Rotating black hole (or in some interpretations even elementary particles) has nonzero torsion.

This doesn't look correct either. A rotating black hole is described by the Kerr solution in standard GR, again with a torsion-free connection.
 
  • #10
Stollaxel Stoll said:
From the perspective of an outer observer all the material that builds the black hole is stuck on the horizon because of the infinite time dilation at its surface.

This is not correct. A black hole is a vacuum solution; there is no "material" anywhere.

The rest of your post does not look correct either. It is very important in this subject to look at the actual math, not at heuristic pop science descriptions.
 
  • #11
Gonzalo Chumillas said:
Maybe, the angular momentum can be understood as a distortion in the adjacent space-time around the black hole, not the black hole itself.

This is actually a good heuristic way of understanding, not just the angular momentum, but the mass of the hole (or indeed of any isolated object). If you go far away from the object and measure the geometry of spacetime, you will find certain aspects of that geometry that correspond to "mass" and "angular momentum". For example, you can put test objects in orbit about the isolated object and measure their orbital parameters, and from those measurements you can compute the mass and angular momentum of the isolated object.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K