What does the number 0.62 in MCNP refer to?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aly_19f
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cards Mcnp
AI Thread Summary
The number 0.62 refers to the lwtr.62t library, which is a S(a,b) library for Hydrogen in Light Water from the ENDF/B 6.3 dataset. This library is associated with a temperature of 500 K, although older references may indicate 600 K. Users are advised to consult "Appendix G" of the MCNP manual relevant to their code version for accurate material and temperature listings. The discussion highlights the importance of using updated versions of the library, such as ENDF/B 7 or 8, for better accuracy. Accurate documentation is essential for proper data interpretation in nuclear simulations.
Aly_19f
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
What does the number 0.62 refer to?
Does it the water density at high temperature?
 

Attachments

  • pic.PNG
    pic.PNG
    5.5 KB · Views: 220
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi,
it is the name of the library,
lwtr.62t is a S(a,b) library for Hydrogen in Light Water :
endf 6.3 ; 500 K
 
To find a list of materials and temperatures, you need to look in "Appendix G" of the MCNP manual for the version of the code you are using.

I don't know what version of the code you are using, but lwtr.62t is from ENDF/B 6.3 (1993).
This is pretty old, I would use version 7 or possibly 8.

Looking at an older version of "Appendix G", lwtr.62t refers to 600 K
https://mcnp.lanl.gov/pdf_files/la-ur-03-1987g_sab.pdf

Looking at the version of Appendix G distributed with my version (LA-UR-17-20709), lwtr.62 refers to 500 K.

You need to look at the documentation distributed with your library.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
824
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top