What does the number 0.62 in MCNP refer to?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aly_19f
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cards Mcnp
Click For Summary
The number 0.62 refers to the lwtr.62t library, which is a S(a,b) library for Hydrogen in Light Water from the ENDF/B 6.3 dataset. This library is associated with a temperature of 500 K, although older references may indicate 600 K. Users are advised to consult "Appendix G" of the MCNP manual relevant to their code version for accurate material and temperature listings. The discussion highlights the importance of using updated versions of the library, such as ENDF/B 7 or 8, for better accuracy. Accurate documentation is essential for proper data interpretation in nuclear simulations.
Aly_19f
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
What does the number 0.62 refer to?
Does it the water density at high temperature?
 

Attachments

  • pic.PNG
    pic.PNG
    5.5 KB · Views: 226
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi,
it is the name of the library,
lwtr.62t is a S(a,b) library for Hydrogen in Light Water :
endf 6.3 ; 500 K
 
To find a list of materials and temperatures, you need to look in "Appendix G" of the MCNP manual for the version of the code you are using.

I don't know what version of the code you are using, but lwtr.62t is from ENDF/B 6.3 (1993).
This is pretty old, I would use version 7 or possibly 8.

Looking at an older version of "Appendix G", lwtr.62t refers to 600 K
https://mcnp.lanl.gov/pdf_files/la-ur-03-1987g_sab.pdf

Looking at the version of Appendix G distributed with my version (LA-UR-17-20709), lwtr.62 refers to 500 K.

You need to look at the documentation distributed with your library.
 
I'd like to start a discussion/debate of nuclear power for the purpose of informing people about it. I am participating in a thread in another forum http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=9370 where we are discussing an article about Germany planning to phase out nuclear power. I am STRONGLY against this. It is bad for scientific, economic, political, and environmental reasons. In the course of discussions of the nuclear power issue, it seems to me that the arguements...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K