What does this expression involving Partial Derivatives mean?

[physicss]

Homework Statement

Hello, what does this expression mean?

Relevant Equations

(Picture)

I already solved w x x/|x|
For (w1,w2,w3) and (x1,x2,x3)

 

[haruspex]

Homework Statement: Hello, what does this expression mean?
Relevant Equations: (Picture)

I already solved w x x/|x|
For (w1,w2,w3) and (x1,x2,x3) View attachment 327170

Then you just have to take the partial derivative wrt $x_i$ and again wrt $x_j$.

 

[physicss]

Then you just have to take the partial derivative wrt $x_i$ and again wrt $x_j$.

Thanks for the answer. Would xi and xj be x1 and x2 in this case?

 

[haruspex]

Thanks for the answer. Would xi and xj be x1 and x2 in this case?

No. Because the function is symmetric in the three parameters, you can replace them with $x_i$, $x_j$, $x_k$, where it is understood that {i,j,k}={1,2,3}, but which is which is unspecified.
For example, suppose you had the function $x_1x_2x_3$ then its partial derivative wrt $x_i$ and $x_j$ would be $x_k$.

Edit, you might also need to assume that i, j, k are in the same cyclic order as 1, 2, 3.

Edit 2: Just realised my posts may be off the mark. I need to solve it myself first.

Edit 3:
Rereading the question, I see it does not refer to indices 1, 2, 3. That is something you assumed. So my correct answer to your post #3 is:

Yes, they are using i, j, k as the indices, not 1, 2, 3.

 

[physicss]

No. Because the function is symmetric in the three parameters, you can replace them with $x_i$, $x_j$, $x_k$, where it is understood that {i,j,k}={1,2,3}, but which is which is unspecified.
For example, suppose you had the function $x_1x_2x_3$ then its partial derivative wrt $x_i$ and $x_j$ would be $x_k$.

Edit, you might also need to assume that i, j, k are in the same cyclic order as 1, 2, 3.

Edit 2: Just realised my posts may be off the mark. I need to solve it myself first.

Edit 3:
Rereading the question, I see it does not refer to indices 1, 2, 3. That is something you assumed. So my correct answer to your post #3 is:

Yes, they are using i, j, k as the indices, not 1, 2, 3.

Thank you

 

[kuruman]

Presumably $\vec {\omega}$ is constant and does not depend on the $x_i$. I would try the brute force method which is always safe.

1. Write $\dfrac{\vec x}{|\vec x|}=\dfrac{x_1~\hat{x}_1+x_2~\hat{x}_2+x_3~\hat{x}_3}{\left[x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2 \right]^{1/2}}.$
2. Find $\dfrac{\partial^2}{\partial x_1\partial x_2}\left( \dfrac{x_1~\hat{x}_1+x_2~\hat{x}_2+x_3~\hat{x}_3}{\left[x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2 \right]^{1/2}} \right)$.
3. Do a cyclic permutation of indices to find the other two terms.
4. Take the cross product.

There might a simpler way to do this but I can't see what it is. I assume that in your original expression you have "off-diagonal" elements only, i.e. it is stipulated somewhere that $i\neq j$.