What does this notation mean? Linear map A = [A^\mu \nu]_\mu \nu

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the notation and interpretation of a linear map A represented as A = [A^{\mu \nu}]_{\mu \nu}, specifically in the context of vector spaces and their decompositions. Participants explore the implications of this notation in a proof, focusing on the nature of the decomposition and the properties of the linear map.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that A is a linear map from a vector space V onto itself and questions the nature of the decomposition that allows A to be rewritten in the specified form.
  • Another participant suggests that the notation may be an obtuse way of expressing the matrix representation of A in a given basis, indexed by \mu and \nu.
  • Concerns are raised about the fixing of the codomain for each part of the domain in the matrix representation, with a participant questioning the validity of this approach.
  • One participant clarifies that \mathcal V^\mu refers to different vector spaces labeled by \mu, indicating a generalization.
  • A later reply provides a simplified example of the matrix representation of A in a specific decomposition of V, illustrating how the components of A correspond to mappings between the subspaces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the notation and its implications, with some agreeing on the general idea of expressing A in terms of a basis, while others remain uncertain about specific aspects of the decomposition and the properties of the linear map.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions behind the notation and the specific properties of the linear map A that may affect its representation.

nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
It's used in a certain proof that I'm reading. A is a linear map from a vectorspace V onto itself.

They say they can rewrite the vector space as \mathcal V = \bigoplus_\mu \mathbb C^{m_\mu} \otimes \mathcal V^\mu and I understand this, but they then claim one can (always, as any linear map) rewrite A as A = [A^{\mu \nu}]_{\mu \nu} "where A^{\mu \nu} is a linear map of \mathbb C^{m_\nu} \otimes \mathcal V^\nu to \mathbb C^{m_\mu} \otimes \mathcal V^\mu."

I don't understand the nature of this decomposition/rewriting. Note that this rewriting has to be possible for any A, it doesn't use any special properties of A (that comes later in the proof).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This seems to be an extremely obtuse way of writing the matrix of A in a given basis (indexed by \mu in the domain and by \nu in the range).
 
Writing a matrix in a given basis is possible, but they also fix the codomain for each part of the domain (it seems); I don't see why that is possible.
 
Do they explicitly state what they mean by \mathcal V^\mu?
 
Simply different vector spaces labelled by mu, it's as general as that.
 
Okay, so they are just writing A in terms of a given basis.

For simplicity, let's suppose V = V^1 \oplus V^2. Then, with respect to this decomposition, we can write
A = \begin{pmatrix} A^{11} & A^{12} \\ A^{21} & A^{22}\end{pmatrix}.
Here A^{11} will take V^1 to V^1, and A^{12} will take V^2 to V^1, etc.
 
Oh that makes sense, thank you :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K