What does this notation mean ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vineel49
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Notation
vineel49
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
What does this "(12)" represent in the number 0. (12)22293 93645 534? what does this bracket say ??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi vineel49! welcome to pf! :wink:
vineel49 said:
What does this "(12)" represent in the number 0. (12)22293 93645 534? what does this bracket say ??

what is the context? where did you find this?
 
vineel49 said:
What does this "(12)" represent in the number 0. (12)22293 93645 534? what does this bracket say ??

I've seen it used to indicate a repeating decimal, for example

0.123(4) means 0.123444444444...

But I've never seen that notation used in the way you indicated. What was the context?
 
well, I figured it out. It means there are 12 zeros after the decimal point. I found this number in the "zeros and weight factors table for HERMITE POLYNOMIAL".
 
vineel49 said:
well, I figured it out. It means there are 12 zeros after the decimal point. I found this number in the "zeros and weight factors table for HERMITE POLYNOMIAL".



We have scientific notation for that.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top