I What does V^G mean in linear algebra?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cask1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
cask1
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Hi. Newbee question. What does the notation V^G mean where V is a vector space and G is a group? I found it in: A linear algebraic group G is called linearly reductive if for every rational representation V and every v in V^G \ {0}, there exists a linear invariant function f in (V^*)^G such that f(v)<>0. I can't find a definition of the notation using google. Thanks.
Hi. Newbee question. What does the notation V^G mean where V is a vector space and G is a group? I found it in: A linear algebraic group G is called linearly reductive if for every rational representation V and every v in V^G \ {0}, there exists a linear invariant function f in (V^*)^G such that f(v)<>0. I can't find a definition of the notation using google. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Normally for sets ##X## and ##Y##, ##X^Y## is the set of functions from ##Y## to ##X##. In a context like this, it's often meant to be limited to functions of the desired type, e.g. only representations.

That doesn't really make sense here, since a representation is a map ##G\to GL(V)##, not a map from ##G## to ##V##.
 
When a group ##G## acts on a set ##X## (in your case ##V##), sometimes one writes ##X^G## for the set of invariant elements, that is, the elements of ##X## that are fixed by all group elements. Note that if ##G## acts linearly on ##V##, then it also does on ##V^*##, so it makes sense to write ##(V^*)^G## in your example.
 
Last edited:
The AI summary explanation that ends this thread, visible only when not logged in, incorrectly equates V^G with V ^*, and hence virtually every statement in it is false.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
752
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
976
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
390
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
706
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K