What energy do electrons actually take in an orbital?

In summary, when an electron is in the ground state, it has a definite energy. This energy is affected by external forces, and can change over time.
  • #1
feynmann
156
1
If electrons are found somewhere within an orbital, what kind of energy they have?
In other word, if kinetic and potential energy of electrons change with time in the ground state of atoms?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The total energy is fixed and definite, because an orbital is an energy eigenstate. The potential and kinetic energies are both indefinite until they are measured, so in the meantime we can speak only of probability distributions and expectation values, and the constraint that the two (kinetic and potential) must add up to the fixed total energy.
 
  • #3
jtbell said:
The total energy is fixed and definite, because an orbital is an energy eigenstate. The potential and kinetic energies are both indefinite until they are measured, so in the meantime we can speak only of probability distributions and expectation values, and the constraint that the two (kinetic and potential) must add up to the fixed total energy.


<cough> .. And ,.. that the "fixed" total-energy for all known electrons is "variable" over time
 
  • #4
I assume that by "orbital", feynmann was referring to bound states of atomic electrons that have specific values for the quantum numbers n, l, and [itex]m_l[/itex]. The energies of these states do not vary with time unless there is an externally-applied magnetic or electric field that varies with time. Maybe you're thinking of something different?
 
  • #5
yes that is the line of reasoning .. just that at every duration of time that we are able to measure they are subject to environmental EMF flux to some degree or other - at least as far a we are aware that is the case . thus always in a state of Delta .

Only under certain circumstances of energy/geometry etc .. does the transfer of energy mean a shift in orbital level .. most of the time it must be just flux - more like resonating vibrations
 
Last edited:
  • #6
thaddeus said:
yes that is the line of reasoning .. just that at every duration of time that we are able to measure they are subject to environmental EMF flux to some degree or other - at least as far a we are aware that is the case . thus always in a state of Delta .

Where is this "environmental EMF flux" in the Hamiltonian that one sets up for, say, the typical hydrogenic atom?

Only under certain circumstances of energy/geometry etc .. does the transfer of energy mean a shift in orbital level .. most of the time it must be just flux - more like resonating vibrations

So the [itex]\Psi_{nlm}[/itex] that one gets when solving such a system doesn't tell you the energy state of that orbital?

Zz.
 
  • #7
jtbell said:
The total energy is fixed and definite, because an orbital is an energy eigenstate. The potential and kinetic energies are both indefinite until they are measured, so in the meantime we can speak only of probability distributions and expectation values, and the constraint that the two (kinetic and potential) must add up to the fixed total energy.

Suppose the electron of hydrogen atom is in the ground state, so the total energy is -13.6 eV,
It's possible to find the electron very far away from the proton, the potential energy is zero at infinity, since the total energy is fixed, this left the kinetic energy of electron to -13.6 eV. Can kinetic energy of electron be negative in quantum mechanics?
 
Last edited:
  • #8
No kinetic energy cannot be negative.
You are cheating. Once you argue with quantum mechanics, you need to check what the classical proposal that you are making means.

You still seem to assume that there are small electrons flying around in their orbitals, but they don't. The whole orbital is the electron. When you check, "where the electron is", you will get a result, which is governed by the wavefunction, it doesn't mean that the electron was there at the time of measurement, it only means, that's where it turned up. At least in the Copenhagen interpretation.
Classically there doesn't seem to be a difference between the two statements, but for a clean Copenhagen interpretation, the electron must not be assumed to exist in another form than the wavefunction, it is especially not "flying around imitating an orbital".
So now to your question:
So let's do your experiment:
- put electron in ground state
- measure position and find it far away from the atom
- measure kinetic energy

When the Electron is in the ground state it is in an Eigenstate of the Energy, so pretty much all hat we know about it, is its Energy*
We don't know its position. When me measure it's position sufficiently accurately we force it into a new eigenstate of the position operator, now its Energy is not known anymore, and it has a new probability distribution. Actually if you measure with very high accuracy the probable outcome for the kinetic energy skyrockets, because of the increasing with of the momentum.

There are a few more ways to look at the problem, some deal with the kinetic energy you induce with the measuring apparatus, but that would strengthen your ideas about a classical explanation that you need to get away from imho.


*yeah yeah and whatever is commutating with it...
 
  • #9
feynmann said:
Suppose the electron of hydrogen atom is in the ground state, so the total energy is -13.6 eV,
It's possible to find the electron very far away from the proton, the potential energy is zero at infinity, since the total energy is fixed, this left the kinetic energy of electron to -13.6 eV. Can kinetic energy of electron be negative in quantum mechanics?

-13.6 is a relative level. To me it means that the electron needs at least 13.6 evolts of energy to completely break from the proton. The electron itself would never have a negative kinetic energy. A bounded electron far from the atom has 13.6 potential energy and very low kinetic energy. An electron close to a proton can have kinetic energy from 0 to 13.6 evolts but not more and still be "bound".
 

1. What is an orbital in terms of atomic structure?

An orbital is a region of space around an atom's nucleus where an electron has a high probability of being found. It is often described as the "cloud" of negative charge that surrounds the positively charged nucleus.

2. How are electrons arranged in an atom's orbitals?

Electrons are arranged in an atom's orbitals according to the Aufbau principle, which states that electrons will fill the lowest energy orbitals first before moving to higher energy orbitals.

3. What determines the energy of an electron in an orbital?

The energy of an electron in an orbital is determined by its distance from the nucleus. The closer an electron is to the nucleus, the lower its energy will be. Additionally, the orbital shape and orientation also play a role in determining the energy of an electron.

4. How does the energy of electrons in orbitals affect chemical reactions?

The energy of electrons in orbitals plays a critical role in chemical reactions. When atoms bond together to form molecules, their electrons interact and undergo changes in energy levels, which ultimately determines the stability of the molecule and the type of chemical reactions it can undergo.

5. Can electrons have the same energy in an orbital?

No, according to the Pauli exclusion principle, no two electrons can have the same set of quantum numbers, which include energy level, orbital shape, and spin. Therefore, electrons in an orbital must have different energies.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
823
Replies
43
Views
3K
Replies
54
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
987
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
833
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
938
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top