What Fraction of Initial Height Causes a Plank to Lose Wall Contact?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tanya Sharma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wall
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a plank of length 2L leaning against a wall, which begins to slip downward without friction. The objective is to determine the fraction of the initial height at which the top of the plank loses contact with the wall.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the plank and the conditions under which it loses contact with the wall. There are attempts to express the coordinates of the center of mass in terms of the angle θ, and some participants suggest using energy conservation principles instead of force and torque equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches, including energy methods and differential equations. Some guidance has been provided regarding the relationships between the variables involved, but no consensus has been reached on a single method or solution.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the coordinate system and the definitions of x and y. Participants are also considering the initial angle of the plank and how it affects the equations being used.

Tanya Sharma
Messages
1,541
Reaction score
135

Homework Statement



A plank of length 2L leans against a wall.It starts to slip downward without friction.At what fraction of the initial height does the top of the plank lose contact with the wall .

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Let the normal force from the vertical wall on top of the plank be N1.
Let the normal force from the floor on bottom of the plank be N2.
Let x and y represent the coordinate of the CM with origin at the bottommost point of the wall.
Let θ be angle which plank makes with the floor at any instant.

The top of the plank loses contact when N1 = 0.

Now,we have

N2-Mg = Md2y/dt2 (1)

N1 = Md2x/dt2 (2)

N1Lsinθ-N2LCosθ = [M(2L)2/12]d2θ/dt2

On simplifying , N1Lsinθ-N2LCosθ = (ML2/3)d2θ/dt2 (3)


Another relation we can obtain is x=Lcosθ

Differentiating,dx/dt = -Lsinθ(dθ/dt)

Again differentiating , d2x/dt2 = -L[cosθ(dθ/dt)2+sinθd2θ/dt2] (4)

How should I proceed further ?

I would be grateful if some member could help me with the problem .


Edit :Fixed errors .Erroneously typed d2x/dt2 in place of d2y/dt2 and vica versa .
 

Attachments

  • plank.PNG
    plank.PNG
    558 bytes · Views: 685
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Tanya,

Good start. You need to express both x and y in terms of θ. (Incidentally, in the coordinate system you are using, shouldn't x = Lsinθ)? Once you have the second derivatives of x and y with respect to t expressed in terms of the time derivatives of θ, you can substitute these into eqns 1 and 2, and solve for N1 and N2. You then substitute these results into the moment balance. This gives an equation entirely in terms of θ.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I believe x = Lcosθ is correct for the x coordinate of the cm. [Edit: Oh, I now see the confusion. Equations (1) and (2) imply x is vertical and y is horizontal, while x = Lcosθ implies x is horizontal.]

I think you can avoid the force and torque equations (1) and (3) by just using energy along with your equation (4).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Sorry for the needless confusion in OP .I have fixed the errors .
 
TSny said:
I believe x = Lcosθ is correct for the x coordinate of the cm. [Edit: Oh, I now see the confusion. Equations (1) and (2) imply x is vertical and y is horizontal, while x = Lcosθ implies x is horizontal.]

I think you can avoid the force and torque equations (1) and (3) by just using energy along with your equation (4).

For using energy should I use : Loss in PE = Gain in Kinetic energy

But then , I am not sure what is the initial position of the plank .Is it vertical or is it at an arbitrary angle, say α
 
Tanya Sharma said:
For using energy should I use : Loss in PE = Gain in Kinetic energy
Yes.

But then , I am not sure what is the initial position of the plank .Is it vertical or is it at an arbitrary angle, say α

Assume it's an arbitrary angle. It will still work out nicely.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Let the initial angle be α then,using COE

mgL(sinα-sinθ) = (2/3)ML2(dθ/dt)2

Is it correct ? If yes ,how to proceed further ?
 
Tanya Sharma said:
Let the initial angle be α then,using COE

mgL(sinα-sinθ) = (2/3)ML2(dθ/dt)2

Is it correct ? If yes ,how to proceed further ?
Did the steps I outlined in my post #2 not work?
 
That looks good.

What do your equations (2) and (4) tell you at the instant the plank loses contact with the vertical wall?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Chestermiller said:
Did the steps I outlined in my post #2 not work?

I apologize for redirecting Tanya towards energy concepts. I happened to find the energy approach to be a nice way to do it. But, of course, the torque and force equations should work, too.
 
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
Did the steps I outlined in my post #2 not work?

Since I had erroneously interchanged d2x/dt2 with d2y/dt2 in OP ,when I first tried the approach outlined by you ,ended up with a complicated DE .But that is mistake on my part :smile:.

I will try again and post the working
 
  • #12
TSny said:
That look's good.

What do your equations (2) and (4) tell you at the instant the plank loses contact with the vertical wall?

This is what i am getting

d2θ/dt2 + (3g/2L)cotθ(sinα-sinθ) = 0

Is it correct ?
 
  • #13
Tanya Sharma said:
This is what i am getting

d2θ/dt2 + (3g/2L)cotθ(sinα-sinθ) = 0

Is it correct ?

Yes.
 
  • #14
Now comes the most difficult part :frown:,solving the DE .

This looks to be a second order DE .But the second term is confusing me.

I will have to look at some reference .Could you please help me identify the DE and the method I have to use .
 
  • #15
You can avoid solving a DE. Can you see a way to use your energy equation to obtain an expression for ##\ddot{θ}##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #16
TSny said:
You can avoid solving a DE. Can you see a way to use your energy equation to obtain an expression for ##\ddot{θ}##?

This is simply outstanding :biggrin:.

Excellent thinking TSny !

Nevertheless ,how can we solve the DE :frown:?
 
  • #17
Tanya Sharma said:
Nevertheless ,how can we solve the DE :frown:?

I don't know. I don't think ##\theta## as a function of time would be very simple.
 

Attachments

  • Planck Sliding Down Wall.png
    Planck Sliding Down Wall.png
    14.4 KB · Views: 1,620
  • #18
:smile:

terrific sense of humour...
 
  • #19
One thing I need to clarify is that θ is measured from the horizontal with clockwise being the direction of increasing θ .

Does that mean direction of increasing θ has to be considered positive ?
Does this reflect on the direction of torque as well with clockwise torque being considered positive and ccw negative ?

Even though I have used this I am having a little doubt .
 
  • #20
TSny said:
I don't know. I don't think ##\theta## as a function of time would be very simple.
I got that time is proportional to ∫cosec(θ/2).dθ, where θ is the angle to the vertical. This is with being vertical initially. That makes sense in that if it really started from vertical with no initial speed then it would take an infinite time.
 
  • #21
haruspex said:
I got that time is proportional to ∫cosec(θ/2).dθ, where θ is the angle to the vertical. This is with being vertical initially. That makes sense in that if it really started from vertical with no initial speed then it would take an infinite time.

Yes. For general starting points, it looks like you might get elliptic integrals of some sort.
 
  • #22
Well, it is difficult to follow the thread without a a picture showing what is meant positive and negative (upward and to the right in the picture, counter-clockwise for the angle).

If you use the angle from the vertical, it is zero initially, and increases anticlockwise with time .

You have two equations for the acceleration of the CM

[tex]m\ddot x=N_x[/tex]
[tex]m\ddot y=N_y-mg[/tex]

and one for the angular acceleration (with respect to the CM)

[tex]\frac{mL^2}{3}\ddot\theta=N_y L\sin(\theta)-N_x L \cos(\theta)[/tex]

From the geometry, x=Lsin(θ), y=Lcos(θ). Substitute the second derivatives into the first equations, then substitute the expressions of Nx and Ny into the third one. You get a very simple second order de for theta(t) *(I do not show :devil:). You need theta when Nx=0. You certainly know the following trick, but I write it just for case...

dθ/dt=ω. Your equation * does not have t explicitly. You can consider ω as function of θ.

[tex]\ddot \theta= \dot \omega = \frac{d \omega}{d \theta}\frac{d \theta}{d t}= \frac{d \omega}{d \theta}\omega =0.5 \frac{d (\omega^2)}{d \theta}[/tex]
Integrating and using that initially θ=0 and ω=0, you get ω2 as function of θ.
Now use the condition for Nx=0.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • ladderwall.JPG
    ladderwall.JPG
    6.6 KB · Views: 583
  • #23
ehild said:
*(I do not show :devil:)

This doesn't look appropriate .

o:) suits you well .
 
  • #24
Have you got that equation? I would like to see it, please, to check if my one is correct.:shy:

ehild
 
  • #25
Please give me some time .
 
  • #26
The DE is d2θ/dt2+2tanθ(dθ/dt)2 = 0 .
 
  • #27
It is not that equation I meant. There must be a "g" somewhere in it. It is best to show your work in detail.

What did you get for the d2x/dt2 and d2y/dt2 in terms of theta and derivatives?ehild
 
  • #28
These are the relations I have been working with . θ is the angle which the plank makes with the horizontal .CW sense is treated positive .

N2-Mg = Md2y/dt2 (1)

N1 = Md2x/dt2 (2)

N1Lsinθ-N2LCosθ = (ML2/3)d2θ/dt2 (3)

d2x/dt2 = -L[cosθ(dθ/dt)2+sinθd2θ/dt2] (4)

d2y/dt2 = L[-sinθ(dθ/dt)2+cosθd2θ/dt2] (5)

I solved the problem using TSny's approach where energy equation was combined with equation (2) and (4) .

There I got the DE d2θ/dt2 + (3g/2L)cotθ(sinα-sinθ) = 0 . Here 'α' is the angle which plank makes ,initially .

I don't know how to solve this DE .But to arrive at the answer solving it was not required.TSny's hint in post #15 worked quite well .
 
Last edited:
  • #29
I see.
The energy conservation is a first integral of the equation of motion, and it was derived using the transformation dv/dt=dv/dx v. It is a method to make a first-order equation from second order one.

With the method I outlined I got the equation [tex]\frac{g}{L} \sin (\beta)= \frac{4}{3}\ddot \beta[/tex], where β is the angle with the wall.
if ω=dβ/dt, [itex]\ddot \beta = \frac{d\omega}{d \beta} \omega[/itex],

[tex]\frac{g}{L} \sin (\beta)= \frac{4}{3} \frac{d\omega}{d \beta} \omega[/tex]

Integrating: [itex]\frac{g}{L} (\cos (\beta_0)-\cos (\beta))= \frac{2}{3} \omega^2 =\frac{2}{3}(\dot \beta)^2[/itex]

Plugging in the expressions for dβ/dt and d2β/dt2 into the equation for the horizontal normal force , we get the final angle.
ehild
 
Last edited:
  • #30
Hi TSny...

Could you respond to post #19
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K