B What geometry theorem is used in this figure?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on identifying the geometry theorem applicable to a figure involving a triangle with sides 8, 4, 6, and a hypotenuse of x=12. Participants clarify that the triangle is not a right triangle, as it does not satisfy the Pythagorean theorem. The triangle angle bisector theorem is identified as relevant, explaining the ratios of the sides and areas of the triangles formed. There is a consensus that accurate diagrams are crucial for solving geometry problems effectively. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity in both drawings and questions for effective communication in geometry.
  • #31
barryj said:
You are wrong. The drawing is correct. You should NEVER assume things. If the drawing does not say it is a right triangle, then do not assume it is.
Ok.
Should we assume that the baseline is one straight line or is there an angle at the vertex between the 4 and 6 length lines?
Should we assume that all those lines to the top meet at the same point? It looks a little like the line farthest to the right comes in at a different point.
Of course, I am being sarcastic. The point is that the easier you can make it for us, the more likely it is that you will get good help.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and phinds
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #32
@barryj you should learn the first rule of conversation/debate: when you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #33
FactChecker said:
Ok.
Should we assume that the baseline is one straight line or is there an angle at the vertex between the 4 and 6 length lines?
Should we assume that all those lines to the top meet at the same point? It looks a little like the line farthest to the right comes in at a different point.
No, there is a 120 degree angle at the 4/6 intersection and the lines do not meet at the same point. They are separated by 2 inches. This thread is getting silly. I am gone!
 
  • #34
barryj said:
No, there is a 120 degree angle at the 4/6 intersection and the lines do not meet at the same point. They are separated by 2 inches. This thread is getting silly. I am gone!
Of course, I was being sarcastic, but I actually thought it was a right angle until I did the calculation and didn't get 12.
 
  • #35
FactChecker said:
Of course, I was being sarcastic, but I actually thought it was a right angle until I did the calculation and didn't get 12.
You had best get another calculator.
 
  • #36
barryj said:
You had best get another calculator.
My calculator is fine. If that was a right angle, the length of ##x## would be 12.8062484748657.
(And the angle would not be bisected to give a partitioning of 4 and 6. Although, I didn't calculate what they should be.)
 
  • #37
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
  • #38
After some thread cleanup, the thread will remain closed. Thank you everybody for helping the OP with his question.
 
  • #39
[Mentor Note -- OP has requested that this clarification post be added to the end of this closed thread]

The moderator closed part 1 before I could post the requested theorem. I have attached the figure and a copy of the theorem from a geometry book for those that are interested.
 

Attachments

  • img261.jpg
    img261.jpg
    20.9 KB · Views: 167
  • img262.jpg
    img262.jpg
    52.4 KB · Views: 140
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K