What happens to the wave function after an operator transformation?

roya
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
for example, if the hamiltonian of a system is transformed this way:
H(x) --> H(x+a)
i understand that the tranformation can be represented by a unitary operator U=exp(iap/\hbar)
UH(x)U^{*}=H(x+a)

but what happens to the wave function? how is it transformed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the operator is transformed, then the wavefunction or state is left alone.
 
what i mean to ask is how does the new wave function look like.
the harmonic oscillator for example, H=p^{2}/2m+m\omega^{2}x^{2}/2
if H(x) --> H(x+a) , then the eigenstates represented in the position basis must go through some sort of transformation as well.
how do i represent that transformation?
 
Last edited:
RedX answered that question. There are two formalisms in quantum mechanics. You can think of a transformation as affecting the wave function only, not the operator, or as affecting the operator only, not the wave function. since you are transforming the Hamiltonian, you are using the second formalism. The wavefunction is not changed in any way. Of course, the eigenvalues and eigenvectors will change because now they are eigenvalues and eigenvectors of this new operator.
 
thanks for the response, i think i partially understand my confusion now.had another question, but just figured it out, so thanks again.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top