MHB What happens when dividing by a negative in an inequality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yazan975
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Range
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the implications of dividing by a negative number in inequalities, specifically in the context of the inequalities -10 < 2x + 3 < -1 and -13 < 2x < -4. Participants emphasize the necessity of flipping the inequality signs when dividing by a negative, as illustrated in the transformation from c + b > -ax > d + b. Dan notes that while greg1313's method is more efficient, the extra step of flipping the inequalities serves to reinforce the concept.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebraic inequalities
  • Familiarity with the properties of inequality manipulation
  • Knowledge of how to rearrange equations
  • Concept of dividing by negative numbers in mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inequalities in algebra
  • Learn about the implications of dividing by negative numbers in mathematical expressions
  • Practice solving complex inequalities with multiple variables
  • Explore different methods for rearranging and solving inequalities
USEFUL FOR

Students learning algebra, educators teaching inequality concepts, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of mathematical properties related to inequalities.

Yazan975
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-09-21 at 1.50.32 PM-min.png
    Screen Shot 2018-09-21 at 1.50.32 PM-min.png
    47.2 KB · Views: 124
Mathematics news on Phys.org
-10 < 2x + 3 < -1
-13 < 2x < -4
-13/2 < x < -2
 
-c < ax + b < -d

Easier to work with (after re-arranging):
c > -(ax + b) > d
 
Wilmer said:
-c < ax + b < -d

Easier to work with (after re-arranging):
c > -(ax + b) > d
But when you get to the step c + b > -ax > d + b you have to divide by -a anyway and the >s flip again. I think it's good in that you get that extra step (to stress the point of what happens when you divide by a negative) but greg1313's method is slightly more efficient.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
But when you get to the step c + b > -ax > d + b you have to divide by -a anyway and the >s flip again. I think it's good in that you get that extra step (to stress the point of what happens when you divide by a negative) but greg1313's method is slightly more efficient.
-Dan
Ya...agree...BUT li'l ole me prefers ? > ? > ? to ? < ? < ?
A bit like reading left to right instead of backwards!
Anyway, not important...
 

Similar threads

Undergrad What Are the Benefits of Triangle Inequality in Mathematics?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB Range of Values For Inequalities
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
MHB Calculating Frequency, Midpoint, Relative Frequency and Cumulative Frequency
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
High School What Are Basic Questions About Understanding Inequalities?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
MHB How to Graph a System of Inequalities for Investment Allocation?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
MHB Find the Range of Values for Negative a
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Does Multiplying or Dividing by a Negative Number Change the Inequality Symbol?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
MHB Is There an Easier Method to Prove $n^2>n$ for Negative Integers?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB *gre.al.9 GRE Exam Inequality with modulus or absolute value
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad When does an inequality indicate a maximum or minimum value?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K