What has to be true to use conservation of momentum vs. energy

  • Thread starter hydralisks
  • Start date
  • #1
20
0
We are currently learning about conservation of momentum and conservation of energy in my intro physics class @ berkeley.

What must be true for me to use one of the other or both (I'd appreciate some common examples of when to use/when not to use them too, if possible)
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
30
0
Conservation of momentum holds for a system when there are no external forces on the system. Since momentum is a vector, we need to check the net force in each direction, and if the net force is zero then the momentum for that direction is conserved.

The primary examples in intro physics are collisions (between blocks, disks, sports equipment, bullets and targets, etc) and also frictionless surface problems like ice skaters who push away from each other or people in boats that push away from each other, etc.

Conservation of energy in a system occurs whenever there is no external work done on the system. Typical causes of external work are friction, air resistance, or normal pushing / pulling.
 
  • #3
rcgldr
Homework Helper
8,721
543
Momentum is conserved in all collisions. Kinetic energy is only conserved in elastic collisions. In the case of inelastic collisions, kinetic energy is lost due to deformation of the objects involved in the collision.
 
  • #4
20
0
Thanks so much for the fast responses! Makes sense!
 

Related Threads on What has to be true to use conservation of momentum vs. energy

  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
375
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
26
Views
18K
Replies
2
Views
596
Top