Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

What has to be true to use conservation of momentum vs. energy

  1. Mar 30, 2009 #1
    We are currently learning about conservation of momentum and conservation of energy in my intro physics class @ berkeley.

    What must be true for me to use one of the other or both (I'd appreciate some common examples of when to use/when not to use them too, if possible)
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 30, 2009 #2
    Conservation of momentum holds for a system when there are no external forces on the system. Since momentum is a vector, we need to check the net force in each direction, and if the net force is zero then the momentum for that direction is conserved.

    The primary examples in intro physics are collisions (between blocks, disks, sports equipment, bullets and targets, etc) and also frictionless surface problems like ice skaters who push away from each other or people in boats that push away from each other, etc.

    Conservation of energy in a system occurs whenever there is no external work done on the system. Typical causes of external work are friction, air resistance, or normal pushing / pulling.
     
  4. Mar 30, 2009 #3

    rcgldr

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Momentum is conserved in all collisions. Kinetic energy is only conserved in elastic collisions. In the case of inelastic collisions, kinetic energy is lost due to deformation of the objects involved in the collision.
     
  5. Mar 30, 2009 #4
    Thanks so much for the fast responses! Makes sense!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook